Lavender Jason M, Anderson Drew A
Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, 12222, USA.
Body Image. 2008 Dec;5(4):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
The purpose of the present study was to compare response rates to questions assessing behaviors associated with body dissatisfaction and disordered eating on a standard self-report questionnaire that was nominally anonymous to an unmatched count questionnaire that allowed for true response anonymity. Five hundred sixty-seven undergraduate students were asked about disordered eating and body image-related behaviors using one of two response formats; either a conventional true-false questionnaire or an unmatched count questionnaire that did not require participants to directly respond to any sensitive questions. Both men and women had significantly different rates of endorsement between the two methods of assessment on the majority of the questions, suggesting that degree of anonymity and format of response may affect endorsements of these potentially sensitive topics. These results contribute to the existing literature highlighting the necessity of understanding self-report bias in determining accurate rates of sensitive behaviors.
本研究的目的是比较在一份名义上匿名的标准自陈问卷与一份允许真正匿名回答的非匹配计数问卷上,评估与身体不满和饮食失调相关行为的问题的回答率。567名本科生被要求使用两种回答格式之一来回答有关饮食失调和身体形象相关行为的问题;一种是传统的是非问卷,另一种是无需参与者直接回答任何敏感问题的非匹配计数问卷。在大多数问题上,两种评估方法中男性和女性的认可率均存在显著差异,这表明匿名程度和回答格式可能会影响对这些潜在敏感话题的认可。这些结果为现有文献做出了贡献,强调了在确定敏感行为的准确发生率时理解自陈偏差的必要性。