• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于直达声与混响声能量比的最小可听差异。

On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

作者信息

Larsen Erik, Iyer Nandini, Lansing Charissa R, Feng Albert S

机构信息

Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):450-61. doi: 10.1121/1.2936368.

DOI:10.1121/1.2936368
PMID:18646989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2677334/
Abstract

The goals of this study were to measure sensitivity to the direct-to-reverberant energy ratio (D/R) across a wide range of D/R values and to gain insight into which cues are used in the discrimination process. The main finding is that changes in D/R are discriminated primarily based on spectral cues. Temporal cues may be used but only when spectral cues are diminished or not available, while sensitivity to interaural cross-correlation is too low to be useful in any of the conditions tested. These findings are based on an acoustic analysis of these variables and the results of two psychophysical experiments. The first experiment employs wideband noise with two values for onset and offset times to determine the D/R just-noticeable difference at -10, 0, 10, and 20 dB D/R. This yielded substantially higher sensitivity to D/R at 0 and 10 dB D/R (2-3 dB) than has been reported previously, while sensitivity is much lower at -10 and 20 dB D/R. The second experiment consists of three parts where specific cues to D/R are reduced or removed, which enabled the specified rank ordering of the cues. The acoustic analysis and psychophysical experiments also provide an explanation for the "auditory horizon effect."

摘要

本研究的目标是测量在广泛的直达声与混响声能量比(D/R)值范围内对其的敏感度,并深入了解在辨别过程中使用了哪些线索。主要发现是,D/R的变化主要基于频谱线索进行辨别。时间线索可能会被使用,但仅在频谱线索减弱或不可用时,而双耳互相关的敏感度太低,在任何测试条件下都无用。这些发现基于对这些变量的声学分析以及两个心理物理学实验的结果。第一个实验采用具有两种起始和结束时间值的宽带噪声,以确定在-10、0、10和20 dB D/R时的D/R刚可察觉差异。这在0和10 dB D/R(2 - 3 dB)时对D/R的敏感度比之前报道的要高得多,而在-10和20 dB D/R时敏感度则低得多。第二个实验由三个部分组成,其中对D/R的特定线索被减少或去除,这使得能够对线索进行指定的排序。声学分析和心理物理学实验也为“听觉地平线效应”提供了解释。

相似文献

1
On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.关于直达声与混响声能量比的最小可听差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):450-61. doi: 10.1121/1.2936368.
2
Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.直达混响能量比灵敏度
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2110-7. doi: 10.1121/1.1506692.
3
Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.使用心理声学辨别和语音线索分类评估人工耳蜗使用者的频谱和时间分辨率
Ear Hear. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):e377-e390. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000328.
4
Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation steps.对耳间相关性阶跃敏感度的电生理和心理物理学不对称性。
Hear Res. 2009 Oct;256(1-2):39-57. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.010. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
5
The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.年龄和两耳间延迟对检测两个声音之间的耳间相关中断的影响。
Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):273-86. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318198703d.
6
Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests.听力受损受试者的声音定位。空间辨别和双耳辨别测试。
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1983;400:1-62. doi: 10.3109/00016488309105590.
7
Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth.调制深度对频谱调制相位反转听觉敏感性的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195686. eCollection 2018.
8
Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses.在教室中定位附近声源:双耳房间脉冲响应
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May;117(5):3100-15. doi: 10.1121/1.1872572.
9
Acoustic cues underlying auditory distance in barn owls.仓鸮听觉距离的声学线索
Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Apr;128(4):382-7. doi: 10.1080/00016480701840114.
10
Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.人工耳蜗使用者在噪声环境中的心理物理学表现及普通话声调识别
Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):62S-65S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031512c.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation to Reverberation for Speech Perception: A Systematic Review.适应混响的语音感知:系统评价。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241273399. doi: 10.1177/23312165241273399.
2
Perceptual Matching of Room Acoustics for Auditory Augmented Reality in Small Rooms - Literature Review and Theoretical Framework.小房间中听觉增强现实的房间声学感知匹配——文献综述与理论框架。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221092919. doi: 10.1177/23312165221092919.
3
Binaural Modelling and Spatial Auditory Cue Analysis of 3D-Printed Ears.双耳建模与 3D 打印耳朵的空间听觉线索分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 1;21(1):227. doi: 10.3390/s21010227.
4
Impact of face masks on voice radiation.口罩对面部声音辐射的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):3663. doi: 10.1121/10.0002853.
5
Cortical auditory distance representation based on direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.基于直达声与混响声能量比的皮质听觉距离表征。
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116436. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116436. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.语音的脑干-皮质功能连接受到噪声和混响的不同程度挑战。
Hear Res. 2018 Sep;367:149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 May 26.
7
Effects of Varying Reverberation on Music Perception for Young Normal-Hearing and Old Hearing-Impaired Listeners.混响变化对年轻正常听力和老年听力障碍者音乐感知的影响。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216517750706. doi: 10.1177/2331216517750706.
8
Sound Spectrum Influences Auditory Distance Perception of Sound Sources Located in a Room Environment.声谱影响位于室内环境中的声源的听觉距离感知。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 22;8:969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00969. eCollection 2017.
9
Hearing Scenes: A Neuromagnetic Signature of Auditory Source and Reverberant Space Separation.听觉场景:听觉声源与混响空间分离的神经磁信号
eNeuro. 2017 Mar 1;4(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0007-17.2017. eCollection 2017 Jan-Feb.
10
Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.人类的听觉距离感知:线索、发展、神经基础及感觉丧失的影响综述
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Feb;78(2):373-95. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1015-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.来自纹理和视差线索的倾斜:最优线索组合
J Vis. 2004 Dec 1;4(12):967-92. doi: 10.1167/4.12.1.
2
Convergence as a cue to absolute distance.作为绝对距离线索的辐合
Rep US Army Med Res Lab. 1961 May 17;467:1-16.
3
Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.直达混响能量比灵敏度
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2110-7. doi: 10.1121/1.1506692.
4
Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation.检测双耳相关性的静态和动态变化。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Oct;112(4):1617-26. doi: 10.1121/1.1504857.
5
Knowledge about typical source output influences perceived auditory distance.关于典型声源输出的知识会影响感知到的听觉距离。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 May;111(5 Pt 1):1980-3. doi: 10.1121/1.1471899.
6
Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics.使用虚拟声学评估听觉距离感知。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Apr;111(4):1832-46. doi: 10.1121/1.1458027.
7
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.人类以统计上最优的方式整合视觉和触觉信息。
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33. doi: 10.1038/415429a.
8
Auditory localization of nearby sources. III. Stimulus effects.附近声源的听觉定位。III. 刺激效应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3589-602. doi: 10.1121/1.428212.
9
Touch can change visual slant perception.触摸可以改变视觉倾斜感知。
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):69-73. doi: 10.1038/71140.
10
Auditory localization of nearby sources. II. Localization of a broadband source.附近声源的听觉定位。II. 宽带声源的定位。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):1956-68. doi: 10.1121/1.427943.