Marin-Kuan Maricel, Cavin Christophe, Delatour Thierry, Schilter Benoît
Nestlé Research Center, Quality and Safety, PO Box 44, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, CH-1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland.
Toxicon. 2008 Aug 1;52(2):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.04.166. Epub 2008 May 29.
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin occurring in a wide range of food products. Because of the limitation of human epidemiological data, the safety significance of OTA in food has to rely on animal data, with renal toxicity and carcinogenicity being considered the pivotal effects. The elucidation of the mechanism of action would improve the use of experimental animal data for risk assessment. Direct genotoxicity versus epigenetic mechanisms appears to be a key question. In the present review, the increasingly documented epigenetic cellular effects of OTA and their potential toxicological relevance are discussed. The information available suggests that OTA is unlikely to act through a single, well-defined mechanism of action. Instead, it is proposed that a network of interacting epigenetic mechanisms, including protein synthesis inhibition, oxidative stress and the activation of specific cell signalling pathways, is responsible for OTA carcinogenicity. From a risk assessment perspective, it has to be noted that the mechanisms proposed above depend mainly upon gene expression and enzyme activation, and are, therefore, likely to be thresholded.
赭曲霉毒素A(OTA)是一种存在于多种食品中的霉菌毒素。由于人类流行病学数据有限,食品中OTA的安全意义不得不依赖动物数据,肾毒性和致癌性被认为是关键影响。作用机制的阐明将改善实验动物数据在风险评估中的应用。直接遗传毒性与表观遗传机制似乎是一个关键问题。在本综述中,讨论了OTA越来越多的表观遗传细胞效应及其潜在的毒理学相关性。现有信息表明,OTA不太可能通过单一、明确的作用机制起作用。相反,有人提出,包括蛋白质合成抑制、氧化应激和特定细胞信号通路激活在内的相互作用的表观遗传机制网络是OTA致癌性的原因。从风险评估的角度来看,必须注意的是,上述机制主要取决于基因表达和酶激活,因此可能存在阈值。