J Clin Pathol. 1991 Feb;44(2):172-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.2.172.
Twenty one heads of departments who participated in the Royal College of Pathologists' pilot study of laboratory accreditation were questioned a year after the event to discover if the process had produced any lasting effect. All but one responded. Eighteen (90%) felt that there had been lasting and tangible benefit from their inspection. Of 10 departments with deficiencies relating to resources (and where no plans to upgrade existed before the study), five (50%) had obtained improvements as a direct result of the inspector's report. Overall, 16 (80%) of respondents were in support of the development of an accreditation scheme of the type attempted, and none were opposed. The envisaged scheme seems to have the potential to produce lasting improvements in service and commands the support of the departments involved so far.
参与皇家病理学家学院实验室认证试点研究的21位部门负责人在活动一年后接受了询问,以了解该过程是否产生了任何持久影响。除一人外,其他人都作出了回应。18人(90%)认为他们的检查带来了持久而切实的益处。在10个存在资源不足问题的部门(且在研究之前没有升级计划)中,有5个部门(50%)由于检查员的报告而直接得到了改善。总体而言,16位(80%)受访者支持开展此类尝试的认证计划,没有人反对。设想中的计划似乎有可能在服务方面产生持久改善,并得到了到目前为止相关部门的支持。