Sobański Piotr, Sinkiewicz Władysław, Kubica Jacek, Błazejewski Jan, Bujak Robert
Department of Cardiology, Regional Heart Failure Centre, Regional Hospital in Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Cardiol J. 2008;15(1):63-70.
Impaired cardiac output (CO) is a key element of heart failure (HF). So far, there has been no simple, reliable, inexpensive and non-invasive CO measurement method feasible for clinical practice. Not a single diagnostic test has been elaborated to diagnose and monitor HF. The aim of the study was the evaluation of the reliability of a new, non-invasive CO measurement device utilizing an inert gas rebreathing technique and an infrared photoacoustic gas analyzer, in comparison with standard invasive methods.
In 21 patients with advanced HF (NYHA classes III and IV) undergoing cardiac catheterization as a routine hemodynamic evaluation before heart transplantation, CO measurements with the tested non-invasive method were carried out during invasive examination.
CO measured by the inert gas rebreathing technique (CO(RB)), according to the statistical Bland-Altman method, was, on average, 0.1 L/min higher than that determined by thermodilution (CO(TD)) and 0.006 L/min higher than the CO determined by the Fick formula (CO(Fick)). This magnitude of difference equals 2.8% of CO(TD) and 0.15% of CO(Fick) values. The limits of agreement between CO(RB) and CO(TD) were +/- 1.4 L/min, and between CO(RB) and CO(Fick) +/- 1.3 L/min. In the subgroup with atrial fibrillation, the mean difference between tested and reference methods (0.3 +/- 1.0 L/min for both CO(TD) and CO(Fick)) was higher than in the sinus rhythm subgroup (0.06 +/- 1.5 L/min for CO(TD) and 0.08 +/- 1.5 for CO(Fick)).
CO measurement with the inert gas rebreathing method utilizing an infrared photoacoustic gas analyzer seems reliable enough to be employed in clinical practice. Being non-invasive, it may well be used for repeated determinations in patients with HF.
心输出量(CO)受损是心力衰竭(HF)的关键因素。到目前为止,尚无一种简单、可靠、廉价且无创的CO测量方法可用于临床实践。尚未制定出单一的诊断测试来诊断和监测HF。本研究的目的是评估一种利用惰性气体重呼吸技术和红外光声气体分析仪的新型无创CO测量设备与标准侵入性方法相比的可靠性。
在21例晚期HF(纽约心脏协会III级和IV级)患者中,在心脏移植前进行心脏导管插入术作为常规血流动力学评估时,在侵入性检查期间使用测试的无创方法进行CO测量。
根据统计的Bland-Altman方法,通过惰性气体重呼吸技术测量的CO(CO(RB))平均比热稀释法测定的CO(CO(TD))高0.1L/min,比Fick公式测定的CO(CO(Fick))高0.006L/min。这种差异程度相当于CO(TD)值的2.8%和CO(Fick)值的0.15%。CO(RB)和CO(TD)之间的一致性界限为±1.4L/min,CO(RB)和CO(Fick)之间为±1.3L/min。在房颤亚组中,测试方法与参考方法之间的平均差异(CO(TD)和CO(Fick)均为0.3±1.0L/min)高于窦性心律亚组(CO(TD)为0.06±1.5L/min,CO(Fick)为0.08±1.5L/min)。
使用红外光声气体分析仪的惰性气体重呼吸法测量CO似乎足够可靠,可用于临床实践。由于其无创性,它很可能用于HF患者的重复测定。