Kutarski Andrzej, Głowniak Andrzej, Szcześniak Dorota, Ruciński Piotr
Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Cardiol J. 2008;15(2):129-42.
Analysis of high gain, signal-averaged (SA) ECG is an accepted method evaluating abnormalities of atrial repolarization--the presence of late potentials (ALP)--predictive for atrial arrhythmias. Recently it has been proven that the location of atrial leads has an influence on atrial activation and modifies the risk of atrial arrhythmias. The aim of our study was to estimate the effect of different modes of atrial pacing on signal-averaged P waves recorded from external (conventional) and from intra-atrial leads.
Recordings were performed in 24 patients during biatrial (BiA) pacing system implantation. A surface SA-ECG was obtained from orthogonal leads, and intra-atrial signals were recorded and averaged separately from the right and left atrium during sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial pacing from the right atrial appendage, coronary sinus or both (BiA pacing). We analyzed standard SA-ECG parameters (P/A wave duration, RMS20 and LAS5) and the presence of atrial late potentials (ALP-Pdur > 125 ms and RMS20 < 2.40 mV).
Right atrial appendage pacing prolongs the duration of atrial potential in external and intracardiac leads and decreases its homogeneity in comparison to SR. RAA pacing increases the occurrence of ALP both in external and internal SA-ECG. Coronary sinus pacing does not deteriorate atrial activation in comparison to SR. Biatrial pacing shortens atrial potential, increases its homogeneity and eliminates atrial late potential criteria in most of patients in comparison to SR. It can be observed both in external and intra-atrial leads and confirms the beneficial effects of BiA pacing on atrial excitation, explaining its antiarrhythmic effect. Evaluation of signal-averaged intra-atrial electrograms supplies more data about local conduction disturbances with micro-voltage oscillations during final part of atrial excitation (low RMS20 and prolonged LAS5) than conventional techniques and seems to be a valuable tool for the evaluation of new resynchronizing atrial pacing modes.
高增益信号平均心电图(SA-ECG)分析是评估心房复极异常(即晚期电位的存在,ALP)的一种公认方法,晚期电位可预测房性心律失常。最近已证实心房导联的位置会影响心房激动并改变房性心律失常的风险。我们研究的目的是评估不同心房起搏模式对从外部(传统)导联和心房内导联记录的信号平均P波的影响。
在24例患者植入双心房(BiA)起搏系统期间进行记录。从正交导联获得体表SA-ECG,并在窦性心律(SR)期间以及从右心耳、冠状窦或两者进行心房起搏(BiA起搏)时,分别从右心房和左心房记录并平均心房内信号。我们分析了标准SA-ECG参数(P/A波持续时间、RMS20和LAS5)以及心房晚期电位的存在情况(ALP-Pdur>125 ms且RMS20<2.40 mV)。
与SR相比,右心耳起搏会延长外部和心内导联中心房电位的持续时间,并降低其均匀性。右心耳起搏会增加外部和内部SA-ECG中ALP的发生率。与SR相比,冠状窦起搏不会使心房激动恶化。与SR相比,双心房起搏会缩短心房电位,增加其均匀性,并在大多数患者中消除心房晚期电位标准。这在外部和心房内导联中均可见,证实了双心房起搏对心房激动的有益作用,解释了其抗心律失常作用。与传统技术相比,信号平均心房内心电图评估在心房激动末期(低RMS20和延长的LAS5)提供了更多关于伴有微电压振荡的局部传导障碍的数据,似乎是评估新型心房再同步起搏模式的有价值工具。