Agapito Filipe, Nunes Paulo M, Costa Cabral Benedito J, Borges dos Santos Rui M, Martinho Simões José A
Centro de Quimica e Bioquimica, Faculdade de Ciencias, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
J Org Chem. 2008 Aug 15;73(16):6213-23. doi: 10.1021/jo800690m. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
The C-H bond dissociation enthalpies (BDEs) for the five- and six-membered ring alkanes, alkenes, and dienes were investigated and discussed in terms of conventional strain energies (SEs). New determinations are reported for cyclopentane and cyclohexane by time-resolved photoacoustic calorimetry and quantum chemistry methods. The C-H BDEs for the alkenes yielding the alkyl radicals cyclopenten-4-yl and cyclohexen-4-yl and the alpha-C-H BDE in cyclopentene were also calculated. The s-homodesmotic model was used to determine SEs for both the parent molecules and the radicals. When the appropriate s-homodesmotic model is chosen, the obtained SEs are in good agreement with the ones derived from group additivity schemes. The different BDEs in the title molecules are explained by the calculated SEs in the parent molecules and their radicals: (1) BDEs leading to alkyl radicals are ca. 10 kJ mol (-1) lower in cyclopentane and cyclopentene than in cyclohexane and cyclohexene, due to a smaller eclipsing strain in the five-membered radicals relative to the parent molecules (six-membered hydrocarbons and their radicals are essentially strain free). (2) C-H BDEs in cyclopentene and cyclohexene leading to the allyl radicals are similar because cyclopenten-3-yl has almost as much strain as its parent molecule, due to a synperiplanar configuration. (3) The C-H BDE in 1,3-cyclopentadiene is 27 kJ mol (-1) higher than in 1,4-cyclohexadiene due to the stabilizing effect of the conjugated double bond in 1,3-cyclopentadiene and not to a destabilization of the cyclopentadienyl radical. The chemical insight afforded by group additivity methods in choosing the correct model for SE estimation is highlighted.
根据传统应变能(SEs)对五元环和六元环烷烃、烯烃及二烯烃的C-H键解离焓(BDEs)进行了研究和讨论。通过时间分辨光声量热法和量子化学方法报道了环戊烷和环己烷的新测定结果。还计算了生成环戊烯-4-基和环己烯-4-基烷基自由基的烯烃的C-H BDEs以及环戊烯中的α-C-H BDEs。采用s-同系反应模型确定母体分子和自由基的SEs。当选择合适的s-同系反应模型时,所得SEs与基团加和法得到的结果吻合良好。通过计算母体分子及其自由基中的SEs解释了标题分子中不同的BDEs:(1)生成烷基自由基的BDEs在环戊烷和环戊烯中比在环己烷和环己烯中约低10 kJ·mol⁻¹,这是因为五元环自由基相对于母体分子(六元环烃及其自由基基本无应变)的扭转应变较小。(2)环戊烯和环己烯中生成烯丙基自由基的C-H BDEs相似,因为环戊烯-3-基由于邻位交叉构型,其应变几乎与其母体分子相同。(3)1,3-环戊二烯中的C-H BDE比1,4-环己二烯中的高27 kJ·mol⁻¹,这是由于1,3-环戊二烯中共轭双键的稳定作用,而非环戊二烯基自由基的不稳定作用。强调了基团加和法在选择正确的SE估计模型时所提供的化学见解。