Suppr超能文献

用于检测尿液中苯二氮䓬类药物的四种免疫分析筛查试剂盒的评估。

Evaluation of four immunoassay screening kits for the detection of benzodiazepines in urine.

作者信息

DeRienz Rebecca T, Holler Justin M, Manos Megan E, Jemionek John, Past Marilyn R

机构信息

Division of Forensic Toxicology, The Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 2008 Jul-Aug;32(6):433-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/32.6.433.

Abstract

The identification of benzodiazepines (BZD) in biological fluids can be a challenging process. The large number of various BZD in pharmaceutical distribution, with similar core structures, and individual metabolic profiles all contribute to a complicated and time-consuming analysis. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the performance of four commercially available immunoassay urine screening kits for use in a forensic urine analysis testing program. The four kits included the Roche Benzodiazepine Plus KIMS assay, Microgenics CEDIA Benzodiazepine assay, Microgenics CEDIA high sensitivity assay with beta-glucuronidase, and Microgenics DRI reagent ready Benzodiazepine assay. Each kit was evaluated for linearity, precision, accuracy, carryover, reagent specificity, and confirmation rates. BZD reagent specificity was compared by analysis of 55 structurally dissimilar compounds to BZD. Negative responses to all 55 compounds were elicited by all four reagent assays. Cross-reactivity for the assays was demonstrated by detecting 27 structurally similar BZD. In addition, greater than 10,000 randomly collected urine samples were screened at a 200 ng/mL cutoff for each assay. Positive samples were confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using a panel of 13 BZD confirmation standards. The Microgenics CEDIA high sensitivity assay demonstrated the highest positive screening rate as well as the highest confirmation rate of the four assays.

摘要

在生物体液中鉴定苯二氮䓬类药物(BZD)可能是一个具有挑战性的过程。药物分销中存在大量结构相似的各类BZD,且个体代谢谱各不相同,这些因素都导致了分析过程复杂且耗时。本研究的目的是评估四种市售免疫分析尿液筛查试剂盒在法医尿液分析检测项目中的性能。这四种试剂盒包括罗氏苯二氮䓬加KIMS分析试剂盒、Microgenics CEDIA苯二氮䓬分析试剂盒、Microgenics CEDIA含β-葡萄糖醛酸酶的高灵敏度分析试剂盒以及Microgenics DRI即用型苯二氮䓬分析试剂盒。对每个试剂盒的线性、精密度、准确度、携带污染、试剂特异性和确证率进行了评估。通过分析55种与BZD结构不同的化合物来比较BZD试剂的特异性。所有四种试剂分析对所有55种化合物均呈阴性反应。通过检测27种结构相似的BZD证明了这些分析方法的交叉反应性。此外,对超过10000份随机收集的尿液样本进行了筛查,每种分析方法的截断值均为200 ng/mL。阳性样本通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪,使用一组13种BZD确证标准进行确证。Microgenics CEDIA高灵敏度分析试剂盒在四种分析方法中显示出最高的阳性筛查率和最高的确证率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验