Spallek Heiko, Butler Brian S, Schleyer Titus K, Weiss Patricia M, Wang Xiaoqing, Thyvalikakath Thankam P, Hatala Courtney L, Naderi Reza A
Center for Dental Informatics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Jun 30;10(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.971.
Science has developed from a solitary pursuit into a team-based collaborative activity and, more recently, into a multidisciplinary research enterprise. The increasingly collaborative character of science, mandated by complex research questions and problems that require many competencies, requires that researchers lower the barriers to the creation of collaborative networks of experts, such as communities of practice (CoPs).
The aim was to assess the information needs of prospective members of a CoP in an emerging field, dental informatics, and to evaluate their expectations of an e-community in order to design a suitable electronic infrastructure.
A Web-based survey instrument was designed and administered to 2768 members of the target audience. Benefit expectations were analyzed for their relationship to (1) the respondents' willingness to participate in the CoP and (2) their involvement in funded research. Two raters coded the respondents' answers regarding expected benefits using a 14-category coding scheme (Kappa = 0.834).
The 256 respondents (11.1% response rate) preferred electronic resources over traditional print material to satisfy their information needs. The most frequently expected benefits from participation in the CoP were general information (85% of respondents), peer networking (31.1%), and identification of potential collaborators and/or research opportunities (23.2%).
The competitive social-information environment in which CoPs are embedded presents both threats to sustainability and opportunities for greater integration and impact. CoP planners seeking to support the development of emerging biomedical science disciplines should blend information resources, social search and filtering, and visibility mechanisms to provide a portfolio of social and information benefits. Assessing benefit expectations and alternatives provides useful information for CoP planners seeking to prioritize community infrastructure development and encourage participation.
科学已从一项孤独的追求发展成为基于团队的协作活动,并且最近又发展成为多学科研究事业。科学日益增强的协作特性,是由需要多种能力的复杂研究问题所决定的,这就要求研究人员降低创建专家协作网络(如实践社区)的障碍。
旨在评估新兴领域——牙科信息学中实践社区潜在成员的信息需求,并评估他们对电子社区的期望,以便设计合适的电子基础设施。
设计了一种基于网络的调查问卷,并向2768名目标受众成员发放。分析了利益期望与以下两方面的关系:(1)受访者参与实践社区的意愿;(2)他们参与资助研究的情况。两名评分者使用14类编码方案(卡帕系数=0.834)对受访者关于预期利益的回答进行编码。
256名受访者(回复率为11.1%)更喜欢电子资源而非传统印刷材料来满足他们的信息需求。参与实践社区最常期望获得的利益是一般信息(85%的受访者)、同行网络(31.1%)以及识别潜在合作者和/或研究机会(23.2%)。
实践社区所处的竞争激烈的社会信息环境既对其可持续性构成威胁,也为更大程度的整合和影响带来机遇。寻求支持新兴生物医学科学学科发展的实践社区规划者应整合信息资源、社会搜索与筛选以及可见性机制,以提供一系列社会和信息利益。评估利益期望和替代方案可为寻求确定社区基础设施发展优先级并鼓励参与的实践社区规划者提供有用信息。