Suppr超能文献

联想记忆检索过程中显性与隐性加工速度的差异。

Divergence of explicit and implicit processing speed during associative memory retrieval.

作者信息

Ellmore Timothy M, Stouffer Kari, Nadel Lynn

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2008 Sep 10;1229:155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Jul 11.

Abstract

Consolidation theory assumes that as time passes, some memories are strengthened and become resistant to change while other memories are weakened and forgotten. Recent demonstrations that implicit, or procedural, memories are retrieved more efficiently after learning and retention are consistent with the idea that these particular memory traces have strengthened with time, and therefore may be accessed faster. However, it is not clear whether the process of explicit memory retrieval also becomes more efficient with time. In two experiments, we explored 1) how much time is required for retrieval of separate explicit and implicit components of hippocampal-dependent visuomotor associative memories after variable retention intervals, and 2) how the explicit and implicit processing times change when the associations are rehearsed after initial retrieval. We found that after learning and retention, explicit and implicit processing times diverged: 1) the time taken to retrieve successfully the explicit component increased relative to a pre-retention baseline but, after spaced rehearsal, decreased, although not to a level significantly below that obtained at the end of learning, and 2) the implicit, or procedural, component processing times continued to gradually decrease after retention, and with continued rehearsal, reached a level significantly below the pre-retention baseline. We conclude that the observed divergence in post-retention reaction times suggests that explicit and implicit memory systems may reorganize differently after learning, and that as a consequence, different amounts of processing time may be required for retrieval of these different memory components.

摘要

巩固理论认为,随着时间的推移,一些记忆会得到强化,变得不易改变,而其他记忆则会被削弱并遗忘。最近有证据表明,内隐记忆或程序性记忆在学习和保持后能更有效地被提取,这与这些特定记忆痕迹随时间得到强化、因此可能被更快提取的观点是一致的。然而,外显记忆提取过程是否也会随着时间变得更高效尚不清楚。在两项实验中,我们探究了:1)在不同的保持间隔后,提取海马体依赖的视觉运动联想记忆中分离的外显和内隐成分分别需要多长时间;2)在初次提取后对联想进行复述时,外显和内隐加工时间会如何变化。我们发现,在学习和保持后,外显和内隐加工时间出现了分化:1)成功提取外显成分所需的时间相对于保持前的基线有所增加,但在间隔复述后减少了,尽管没有降至显著低于学习结束时的水平;2)内隐或程序性成分的加工时间在保持后继续逐渐减少,并且随着持续复述,降至显著低于保持前基线的水平。我们得出结论,观察到的保持后反应时间的差异表明,外显和内隐记忆系统在学习后可能会以不同方式进行重组,因此,提取这些不同记忆成分可能需要不同的加工时间。

相似文献

10
Recollective performance advantages for implicit memory tasks.内隐记忆任务的再认表现优势。
Memory. 2010 Oct;18(7):681-97. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.499876. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Sleep does not benefit probabilistic motor sequence learning.睡眠对概率性运动序列学习没有益处。
J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 14;27(46):12475-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2062-07.2007.
6
Inducing motor skill improvements with a declarative task.通过陈述性任务诱导运动技能改善。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Feb;10(2):148-9. doi: 10.1038/nn1836. Epub 2007 Jan 21.
8
A link between perceptual learning, adaptation and sleep.感知学习、适应与睡眠之间的联系。
Vision Res. 2006 Nov;46(23):4071-4. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.022. Epub 2006 Sep 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验