Cecchi M, Capriles N, Watson S J, Akil H
Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, The University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0720, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Dec 12;194(2):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.06.034. Epub 2008 Jul 6.
We compared acute and chronic antinociceptive effects of morphine in animals with high reactivity (HR) vs. low reactivity (LR) to novelty. Antinociception was assessed by tail-flick test. Rats were i.p. injected with either saline or morphine (1.5 or 3mg/kg) every 12h for 7 days according to the treatment group. On day 1 of the experiment, LR animals in the 1.5mg/kg morphine group showed significantly higher tail-flick latency than HR. Moreover, significant tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine at the used doses was observed in LR but not HR animals. However, effects of chronic morphine treatment on tail-flick latency in rat groups with similar morphine-induced acute antinociception were undistinguishable. The difference in tail-flick latency between HR and LR rats observed after acute 1.5mg/kg morphine injection was eliminated if beta-funaltrexamine (3mg/kg, i.p.) was administered 24h before the test, an indication that mu opioid receptors are responsible for the difference observed. Studies to anatomically characterize the difference in the acute analgesic effect of morphine in HR vs. LR animals did not however yield any significant difference in mu opioid receptor mRNA levels in locus coeruleus (LC), ventral periaqueductal gray (vPAG), nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) and nucleus reticularis paragigantocellularis (NRPG) between these two groups of animals. In conclusion, our results show that differences in novelty-seeking behavior can predict inter-individual variability in morphine-induced antinociception in rats. Such variability is dependent upon activation of mu opioid receptors, but does not correlate with mu opioid receptor expression in LC, vPAG or ventral medulla.
我们比较了对新奇刺激反应性高(HR)和反应性低(LR)的动物中吗啡的急性和慢性抗伤害感受作用。通过甩尾试验评估抗伤害感受。根据治疗组,大鼠每12小时腹腔注射生理盐水或吗啡(1.5或3mg/kg),持续7天。在实验的第1天,1.5mg/kg吗啡组的LR动物甩尾潜伏期显著高于HR动物。此外,在LR动物中观察到对所用剂量吗啡的抗伤害感受作用有显著耐受性,而HR动物中未观察到。然而,慢性吗啡治疗对具有相似吗啡诱导急性抗伤害感受的大鼠组甩尾潜伏期的影响无法区分。如果在测试前24小时给予β-氟纳曲胺(3mg/kg,腹腔注射),则消除了急性注射1.5mg/kg吗啡后观察到的HR和LR大鼠之间甩尾潜伏期的差异,这表明μ阿片受体是观察到的差异的原因。然而对HR和LR动物中吗啡急性镇痛作用差异进行解剖学特征研究时,两组动物在蓝斑(LC)、腹侧导水管周围灰质(vPAG)、中缝大核(NRM)和巨细胞旁网状核(NRPG)中的μ阿片受体mRNA水平没有显著差异。总之,我们的结果表明,寻求新奇行为的差异可以预测大鼠中吗啡诱导的抗伤害感受的个体间变异性。这种变异性取决于μ阿片受体的激活,但与LC、vPAG或延髓腹侧的μ阿片受体表达无关。