相似文献
1
Perceived journal quality: an indicator of research quality.
Women Birth. 2008 Sep;21(3):97-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
2
The development of a ranking tool for refereed journals in which nursing and midwifery researchers publish their work.
Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Jul;30(5):420-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.09.016. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
3
Peer review and the nursing literature.
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):73. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31819f1589.
4
Consider the source.
Am J Nurs. 2009 Apr;109(4):7. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000348565.33769.54.
5
[Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Perspect Infirm. 2006 Jan-Feb;3(3):35-9.
6
If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
Am J Nurs. 2009 Dec;109(12):7. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000365160.71471.42.
7
Publication ethics.
Public Health Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;26(3):205-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00772.x.
8
Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
Nurs Outlook. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):169-70. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.006.
9
Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
Nurse Author Ed. 2005 Winter;15(1):1-4, 7.
10
The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Jan;12(1):1-2. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283426332.
Zotero 插件