Daugherty Stacie L, Peterson Pamela N, Magid David J, Ho P Michael, Bondy Jessica, Hokanson John E, Ross Colleen A, Rumsfeld John S, Masoudi Frederick A
Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Am Heart J. 2008 Aug;156(2):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.022. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
Controversy remains regarding whether gender differences exist in clinical management after exercise treadmill testing (ETT).
We studied 7,506 patients (49.8% women) without documented coronary heart disease referred for ETT from July 2001 to June 2004 in a community-based setting. We assessed the relationship between gender and subsequent diagnostic testing (secondary stress testing or coronary angiography) within 6 months after ETT. Secondary outcomes included subsequent stress testing, coronary angiography, and new cardiology visits in the 6-month interval. Multivariable analyses assessed the relationship between gender and these outcomes adjusting for demographic, clinical, and stress test characteristics. In subsequent analyses, patients were stratified by Duke Treadmill Scores (Duke University, Durham, NC).
Compared with men, women referred for ETT were older, had a higher prevalence of some cardiac risk factors, achieved lower peak workloads, and, more often, experienced chest pain or ST-segment changes. After accounting for differences in clinical and ETT parameters, gender was not associated with any subsequent diagnostic testing in the 6 months after ETT (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.85-1.18). In secondary analyses, women were less likely to undergo angiography (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.83) with a trend toward more subsequent stress testing. Stratified analyses revealed less subsequent testing in high-to-intermediate Duke Treadmill Score women compared with men (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.79). Women and men were equally likely to die (hazards ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.61-1.44) in the adjusted survival analysis.
Overall, women and men equally underwent subsequent diagnostic testing after ETT. Although women were less likely to undergo angiography and higher-risk women were less likely to undergo subsequent testing, adverse events were not higher in women. Given these findings, assumptions regarding gender disparities in clinical management after ETT should be reevaluated in other settings.
运动平板试验(ETT)后临床管理中是否存在性别差异仍存在争议。
我们研究了2001年7月至2004年6月在社区环境中因ETT就诊的7506例无冠心病记录的患者(49.8%为女性)。我们评估了性别与ETT后6个月内后续诊断检查(二次负荷试验或冠状动脉造影)之间的关系。次要结局包括后续负荷试验、冠状动脉造影以及6个月内新的心脏病就诊情况。多变量分析评估了性别与这些结局之间的关系,并对人口统计学、临床和负荷试验特征进行了校正。在后续分析中,患者按杜克运动平板评分(杜克大学,北卡罗来纳州达勒姆)进行分层。
与男性相比,因ETT就诊的女性年龄更大,某些心脏危险因素的患病率更高,达到的峰值工作量更低,且更常出现胸痛或ST段改变。在考虑临床和ETT参数差异后,性别与ETT后6个月内的任何后续诊断检查均无关联(比值比1.0,95%可信区间0.85 - 1.18)。在次要分析中,女性接受血管造影的可能性较小(比值比0.63,95%可信区间0.47 - 0.83),且有进行更多后续负荷试验的趋势。分层分析显示,与男性相比,杜克运动平板评分中到高的女性后续检查较少(比值比0.61,95%可信区间0.48 - 0.79)。在调整后的生存分析中,女性和男性死亡的可能性相同(风险比0.93,95%可信区间0.61 - 1.44)。
总体而言,女性和男性在ETT后接受后续诊断检查的情况相同。尽管女性接受血管造影的可能性较小,且高危女性接受后续检查的可能性较小,但女性的不良事件并不更高。鉴于这些发现,在其他环境中应重新评估关于ETT后临床管理中性别差异的假设。