Given Barbara K, Wasserman John D, Chari Sharmila A, Beattie Karen, Eden Guinevere F
Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444, USA.
Brain Lang. 2008 Aug;106(2):83-97. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.001.
The current study was conducted to test the premise that computer-based intervention that targets auditory temporal processing combined with language exercises (Fast ForWord) is effective in remediating children with disorders of language and reading. Sixty-five middle school struggling readers were randomly assigned to one of five groups and over a 12-week-period received one of the following interventions: (1) two phases of intervention with Fast ForWord (FFW, experimental group), (2) two phases of intervention with SuccessMaker (SM, active control group), (3) FFW followed by SM, (4) SM followed by FFW, or (5) no intervention beyond the regular class curriculum (developmental control group). Changes in reading, phonemic awareness, spelling and language skills were assessed via a repeated measures MANOVA. Results indicated significant within-subjects effects (i.e., change for all participants over time), but no between-subject group differences, failing to show that Fast ForWord resulted in any gains over and above those seen in the other groups.
针对听觉时间处理并结合语言练习的计算机辅助干预(Fast ForWord)对语言和阅读障碍儿童的矫治有效。65名初中阅读困难学生被随机分为五组之一,并在12周的时间内接受以下干预措施之一:(1)两阶段的Fast ForWord干预(FFW,实验组),(2)两阶段的SuccessMaker干预(SM,积极对照组),(3)先进行FFW干预,后进行SM干预,(4)先进行SM干预,后进行FFW干预,或(5)除常规课堂课程外不进行任何干预(发育对照组)。通过重复测量多变量方差分析评估阅读、音素意识、拼写和语言技能的变化。结果表明存在显著的受试者内效应(即所有参与者随时间的变化),但受试者间组间无差异,未能表明Fast ForWord比其他组有任何额外的收获。