Suppr超能文献

在标准化疗基础上加用利妥昔单抗可提高弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤生发中心B细胞样和非生发中心B细胞样亚型的生存率。

Addition of rituximab to standard chemotherapy improves the survival of both the germinal center B-cell-like and non-germinal center B-cell-like subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

作者信息

Fu Kai, Weisenburger Dennis D, Choi William W L, Perry Kyle D, Smith Lynette M, Shi Xinlan, Hans Christine P, Greiner Timothy C, Bierman Philip J, Bociek R Gregory, Armitage James O, Chan Wing C, Vose Julie M

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-7680, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;26(28):4587-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9277. Epub 2008 Jul 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) includes at least two prognostically important subtypes (ie, germinal center B-cell-like [GCB] and activated B-cell-like [ABC] DLBCL), which initially were characterized by gene expression profiling and subsequently were confirmed by immunostaining. However, with the addition of rituximab to standard chemotherapy, the prognostic significance of this subclassification of DLBCL is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 243 patient cases of de novo DLBCL, which included 131 patient cases treated with rituximab plus standard chemotherapy (rituximab group) and 112 patient cases treated with only standard chemotherapy (control group). The cases were assigned to GCB or non-GCB subgroups (the latter of which included both ABC DLBCL and unclassifiable DLBCL) on the basis of immunophenotype by using the Hans method. Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of the two patient groups were compared.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of the patients in the rituximab and the control groups were similar. Compared with the control group, addition of rituximab improved the 3-year overall survival (OS; 42% v 77%; P < .001) of patients with DLBCL. Rituximab-treated patients in either the GCB or the non-GCB subgroups also had a significantly improved 3-year OS compared with their respective subgroups in the control group (P < .001). In the rituximab group, the GCB subgroup had a significantly better 3-year OS than the non-GCB subgroup (85% v 69%; P = .032). Multivariate analyses confirmed that rituximab treatment was predictive for survival in both the GCB and the non-GCB subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, we have shown that the subclassification of DLBCL on the basis of the cell of origin continues to have prognostic importance in the rituximab era.

摘要

目的

弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)包括至少两种具有重要预后意义的亚型(即生发中心B细胞样[GCB]和活化B细胞样[ABC] DLBCL),最初通过基因表达谱进行特征描述,随后通过免疫染色得到证实。然而,随着利妥昔单抗加入标准化疗,DLBCL这种亚分类的预后意义尚不清楚。

患者与方法

我们研究了243例初发DLBCL患者,其中131例接受利妥昔单抗联合标准化疗(利妥昔单抗组),112例仅接受标准化疗(对照组)。采用汉斯方法根据免疫表型将病例分为GCB或非GCB亚组(后者包括ABC DLBCL和无法分类的DLBCL)。比较两组患者的临床特征和生存结局。

结果

利妥昔单抗组和对照组患者的临床特征相似。与对照组相比,添加利妥昔单抗提高了DLBCL患者的3年总生存率(OS;42%对77%;P <.001)。利妥昔单抗治疗的GCB或非GCB亚组患者与对照组各自亚组相比,3年OS也显著提高(P <.001)。在利妥昔单抗组中,GCB亚组的3年OS明显优于非GCB亚组(85%对69%;P =.032)。多因素分析证实,利妥昔单抗治疗对GCB和非GCB亚组的生存均具有预测价值。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,我们表明在利妥昔单抗时代,基于起源细胞的DLBCL亚分类仍然具有预后重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验