Suppr超能文献

[经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗睡眠呼吸暂停患者的初始及二次治疗失败的处理]

[Treatment of primary and secondary therapy failure in patients with sleep apnea treated with nasal CPAP].

作者信息

Becker H, Fett I, Nees E, Peter J H, von Wichert P

机构信息

Medizinische Poliklinik, Philipps-Universität Marburg.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 1991 May;45 Suppl 1:301-5.

PMID:1866413
Abstract

Two forms of treatment failure of nCPAP therapy should be distinguished: 1. Primary treatment failure: the reversal of apnoeas and hypopnoeas cannot be achieved due to central SA or a combination of MSA and central hypoventilation. In 10 patients who did not respond to nCPAP (7 patients with purely central SA and 3 patients with MSA who still demonstrated long phases of central hypoventilation during nCPAP) we performed a nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) during at least 3 treatment nights. In all patients a reversal of apnoeas and hypopnoeas could be achieved, despite a few phases of mask leakage. Due to possibly life threatening side effects continuous monitoring is required during the initial treatment phase. 8 patients who reported a reduction of symptoms have been successfully using the treatment at home for up to 22 months. 2. Secondary treatment failure: nCPAP leads to a normalisation of breathing pattern but patients refuse nCPAP or discontinue treatment. Besides patients who are poorly motivated there are four major side effects of nCPAP as a reason for non-compliance: a) drying out of the nasopharyngeal mucosa or rhinitis; b) pressure marks caused by the nose mask; c) intolerance to the high expiratory pressure; d) noise. Drying out of the mucosa and rhinitis are the most important side effects. If an increase of room temperature and humidity, nasal cream and small amounts of mint-oil as well as a heat-moisture exchanger (HME) prove inadequate, we use a heated humidifier (Dräger, Aquapor).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

应区分无创持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)治疗失败的两种形式:1. 原发性治疗失败:由于中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(SA)或混合性睡眠呼吸暂停(MSA)与中枢性通气不足的组合,无法实现呼吸暂停和低通气的逆转。在10例对nCPAP无反应的患者中(7例为单纯中枢性SA,3例为MSA,在nCPAP治疗期间仍表现出长时间的中枢性通气不足),我们在至少3个治疗夜间进行了鼻间歇正压通气(nIPPV)。尽管有一些面罩漏气阶段,但所有患者的呼吸暂停和低通气均得以逆转。由于可能存在危及生命的副作用,在初始治疗阶段需要持续监测。8例报告症状减轻的患者已在家中成功使用该治疗长达22个月。2. 继发性治疗失败:nCPAP可使呼吸模式正常化,但患者拒绝使用nCPAP或停止治疗。除了积极性不高的患者外,nCPAP还有四个主要副作用导致患者不依从:a)鼻咽黏膜干燥或鼻炎;b)鼻面罩造成的压痕;c)对高呼气压力不耐受;d)噪音。黏膜干燥和鼻炎是最重要的副作用。如果提高室温及湿度、使用鼻用乳膏和少量薄荷油以及热湿交换器(HME)均不足够,我们会使用加热加湿器(德尔格,水通道)。(摘要截选于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验