Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in a high-prevalence pediatric population: a comparison of 2 fecal antigen testing methods and serology.

OBJECTIVES

Accurate methods for diagnosing active Helicobacter pylori infection in children have been limited to invasive or time-consuming techniques. Recently, fecal antigen testing has been used successfully for the diagnosis of H pylori infection in the pediatric population. We compared 2 monoclonal fecal antigen diagnostic methods in a population of children with a suspected high prevalence of H pylori infection. We also assessed the diagnostic performance of H pylori immunoglobulin G serology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional study of African refugee children (<16 years) we compared an immunochromatographic technique (ICT) and serology with a monoclonal fecal antigen enzyme immunoassay (MFAT) method for the detection of active H pylori infection. Following the manufacturer's instructions, an optical density of >or=0.190 was used as a cutoff for MFAT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 193 eligible children enrolled, active H pylori infection was detected in 149 of 182 (81.9%) in whom MFAT was performed. The prevalence of active infection increased with age; children with active infection were significantly older, and there were no sex differences. ICT and serology underperformed in comparison with MFAT (ICT sensitivity 74.6%, specificity 63.6%, positive predictive value 89.8%, negative predictive value 36.8%; and serology sensitivity 57.9%, specificity 77.4%, positive predictive value 92.0%, negative predictive value 29.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Monoclonal enzyme immunoassay fecal antigen testing is a practical and feasible alternative to traditional invasive diagnostic methods in high-prevalence pediatric populations. Neither immunochromatography nor serology is useful for the diagnosis of active H pylori infection in these children.