• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标工具性如何塑造关系评价。

How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations.

作者信息

Fitzsimons Gráinne M, Shah James Y

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Aug;95(2):319-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319
PMID:18665705
Abstract

Findings from 6 experiments support the hypothesis that relationship evaluations and behavioral tendencies are goal dependent, reflecting the instrumentality of significant others for the self's progress toward currently active goals. Experiments 1 and 3 found that active goals can automatically bring to mind significant others who are instrumental for the activated goal, heightening their accessibility relative to noninstrumental others. Experiments 2-5 found that active goals cause individuals to evaluate instrumental others more positively, draw closer to them, and approach them more readily, compared with noninstrumental others. Experiment 6 found that people who engage in goal-dependent interpersonal evaluations are more successful, receiving higher grades. Implications for understanding the social nature of self-regulation and the impact of personal goals on interpersonal relationships are discussed.

摘要

6项实验的结果支持了这样一种假设,即关系评估和行为倾向取决于目标,反映了重要他人对自我朝着当前活跃目标前进的工具性作用。实验1和3发现,活跃的目标能够自动唤起对实现该活跃目标有帮助的重要他人,从而使他们相对于无帮助的他人更容易被想起。实验2至5发现,与无帮助的他人相比,活跃的目标会使个体对有帮助的他人评价更高,与他们更亲近,也更愿意接近他们。实验6发现,进行基于目标的人际评估的人更成功,成绩更高。本文还讨论了这些结果对于理解自我调节的社会本质以及个人目标对人际关系的影响。

相似文献

1
How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations.目标工具性如何塑造关系评价。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Aug;95(2):319-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319.
2
Shifting closeness: interpersonal effects of personal goal progress.转变亲密关系:个人目标进展的人际影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Apr;98(4):535-49. doi: 10.1037/a0018581.
3
Confusing one instrumental other for another: goal effects on social categorization.将一个工具与另一个工具混淆:目标对社会分类的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1468-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02475.x. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
4
Striving to be known by significant others: automatic activation of self-verification goals in relationship contexts.努力被重要他人所了解:在人际关系情境中自我验证目标的自动激活。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):58-73. doi: 10.1037/a0014687.
5
Power and the objectification of social targets.权力与社会目标的客体化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):111-27. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111.
6
The dilution model: how additional goals undermine the perceived instrumentality of a shared path.稀释模型:额外目标如何破坏共享路径的感知工具性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):389-401. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.389.
7
Self-generated goals and goal process appraisals: relationships with sociodemographic factors and well-being.自我设定的目标和目标过程评估:与社会人口学因素及幸福感的关系。
J Adolesc. 2009 Jun;32(3):501-18. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
8
Social achievement goals: the nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence.社会成就目标:对社会能力的不同取向的本质与后果
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;32(9):1246-63. doi: 10.1177/0146167206289345.
9
A secure base: responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships.一个安全基地:成人亲密关系中对目标追求和探索的响应性支持。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):631-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.631.
10
Significant other primes and behavior: motivation to respond to social cues moderates pursuit of prime-induced goals.重要他人启动与行为:对社会线索做出反应的动机调节了对启动诱导目标的追求。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Dec;33(12):1661-74. doi: 10.1177/0146167207307491.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflecting on Dunbar's numbers: Individual differences in energy allocation to personal relationships.反思邓巴数字:人际关系中能量分配的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 11;20(3):e0319604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319604. eCollection 2025.
2
Humanizing Clients With Internalized Neoliberal Ideology Using Contextual Therapy.运用情境疗法使内化新自由主义意识形态的来访者人性化。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1). doi: 10.1111/famp.70007.
3
Exploring the reasons for wanting a peer partner to be physically active among women living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis: a content analysis.
探索女性癌症患者及其康复后希望同伴参与身体活动的原因:内容分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 6;32(7):411. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08602-3.
4
Stuck in short-term, daily operations, or not?: Unraveling SME's long-term orientation.是陷入短期日常运营,还是并非如此?解读中小企业的长期导向。
Small Bus Econ (Dordr). 2023 Mar 24:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11187-023-00748-4.
5
Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis.社会经济地位与对新冠疫情危机的创业网络应对措施
J Bus Econ. 2023;93(1-2):111-147. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01120-w. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
The Influence of Social Support on Higher Vocational Students' Learning Motivation: The Mediating Role of Belief in a Just World and the Moderating Role of Gender.社会支持对高职学生学习动机的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用与性别的调节作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Apr 26;16:1471-1483. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S402643. eCollection 2023.
7
Hand-in-hand in the golden years: Cognitive interdependence, partner involvement in retirement planning, and the transition into retirement.携手共度黄金岁月:认知相互依赖、伴侣参与退休规划与退休过渡。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0261251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261251. eCollection 2021.
8
Will Job Crafters Stay or Leave? The Roles of Organizational Instrumentality and Inclusive Leadership.工作塑造者会留下还是离开?组织工具性和包容性领导的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 8;12:743828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743828. eCollection 2021.
9
Partner Contributions to Goal Pursuit: Findings From Repeated Daily Life Assessments With Older Couples.伴侣对目标追求的贡献:对老年夫妇日常生活重复评估的发现。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jan 12;77(1):29-38. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab052.
10
Don't drink and drive, it's a prime: Cognitive effects of priming alcohol-congruent and incongruent goals among heavy versus light drinkers.切勿酒后驾车,这是首要原则:在重度和轻度饮酒者中,启动与酒精一致和不一致目标的认知效应。
J Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;26(14):2966-2972. doi: 10.1177/1359105320934166. Epub 2020 Jun 12.