• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射科报告的结构和内容,八项医学中心的定量和定性研究。

Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 12, Edegem, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.023. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.023
PMID:18667286
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In order to determine how the quality of the radiology report can be improved, the variation in content, form and length of the report needs to be examined. The purpose of the present study was to investigate and compare the length and structure of radiology reports (reports of abdominal CT examinations) in eight hospitals in the Netherlands and Flanders, the Dutch speaking part of Belgium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight hundred reports--100 from each collaborating center--were collected. After exclusion of the reports that did not fulfill the criteria for a standard CT examination of the abdomen, 525 were retained for further study. The structure of each report was analyzed and the constituting parts (technical information, description of the findings, conclusion, advice, remark, note) were determined. The character and word count of the report and its constituting parts were measured and the results were grouped according to the country (Netherlands vs. Belgium/Flanders), the qualification of the radiologist (staff members vs. residents.) and the nature of the hospital (university medical centers vs. community hospitals).

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found between the Netherlands and Flanders, and between staff members and residents. The authors also found a wide variety in the lay-out and the overall content of the radiology report.

CONCLUSION

While most of the differences we found are probably rooted in local tradition, a standard model for the radiology report in centers sharing the same language may be a means to avoid interpretation mistakes by referring physicians, and to promote better care.

摘要

背景与目的

为了明确如何提高放射学报告的质量,我们需要对报告的内容、形式和长度的变化进行评估。本研究的目的是调查和比较荷兰和佛兰德(比利时的荷语区)8 家医院的放射学报告(腹部 CT 检查报告)的长度和结构。

材料与方法

共收集了 800 份报告,每个合作中心各 100 份。排除不符合腹部标准 CT 检查标准的报告后,保留了 525 份用于进一步研究。分析每份报告的结构,并确定其组成部分(技术信息、发现描述、结论、建议、注释、备注)。对报告及其组成部分的字符和字数进行测量,并根据国家(荷兰与比利时/佛兰德)、放射科医生的资质(工作人员与住院医师)和医院性质(大学医学中心与社区医院)对结果进行分组。

结果

在荷兰与佛兰德、工作人员与住院医师之间均发现了具有统计学意义的差异。我们还发现放射学报告的布局和整体内容存在很大差异。

结论

尽管我们发现的大多数差异可能源于当地的传统,但对于使用同一种语言的中心,使用标准的放射学报告模板可能有助于避免参考医师的解读错误,并促进更好的医疗服务。

相似文献

1
Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.放射科报告的结构和内容,八项医学中心的定量和定性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.023. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
2
Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center.一级创伤中心横断面成像研究的初步与最终放射学报告之间的不一致率。
Acad Radiol. 2008 Oct;15(10):1217-26. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.03.017.
3
[Structure and content of the radiological report: an audit of 94 reports from a university education center].[放射学报告的结构与内容:对某大学教育中心94份报告的审核]
JBR-BTR. 2004 Sep-Oct;87(5):260-4.
4
Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.提高放射学报告质量:一项界定目标的医师调查
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Jul;1(7):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.02.019.
5
Structure and content of 400 CT reports in four teaching hospitals using a new, Windows-based software tool.使用一款基于Windows的新型软件工具,对四家教学医院的400份CT报告的结构和内容进行分析。
Acta Radiol. 2000 Jan;41(1):102-5.
6
A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports.一种评估放射学报告质量的新方法。
Acad Radiol. 2006 Feb;13(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.10.015.
7
A framework for improving radiology reporting.一种改进放射学报告的框架。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Feb;2(2):159-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.015.
8
[Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].[北莱茵-威斯特法伦州门诊影像检查的质量控制,第二部分]
Rofo. 2003 Mar;175(3):346-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37823.
9
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
10
A picture is worth a thousand words: needs assessment for multimedia radiology reports in a large tertiary care medical center.一图胜千言:大型三级医疗中心多媒体放射科报告的需求评估。
Acad Radiol. 2013 Dec;20(12):1577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.002.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of different radiology report formats on patient information processing: a systematic review.不同放射学报告格式对患者信息处理的影响:一项系统综述
Eur Radiol. 2025 May;35(5):2644-2657. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11165-w. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Survey on the radiology report at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital: Clinician and radiologist perspectives.克里斯·哈尼·巴拉格万纳特学术医院放射学报告调查:临床医生和放射科医生的观点
SA J Radiol. 2024 Oct 10;28(1):2954. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2954. eCollection 2024.
3
A Critical Examination of Academic Hospital Practices-Paving the Way for Standardized Structured Reports in Neuroimaging.
对学术医院实践的批判性审视——为神经影像学标准化结构化报告铺平道路。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):4334. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154334.
4
Using Brain Tumor MRI Structured Reporting to Quantify the Impact of Imaging on Brain Tumor Boards.利用脑肿瘤 MRI 结构化报告量化成像对脑肿瘤委员会的影响。
Tomography. 2023 Apr 18;9(2):859-870. doi: 10.3390/tomography9020070.
5
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal.胰腺癌分期中计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像的结构化报告:德尔菲共识提案
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 3;11(11):2033. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112033.
6
Enhancing clinician and patient understanding of radiology reports: a scoping review of international guidelines.增强临床医生和患者对放射学报告的理解:国际指南的范围审查
Insights Imaging. 2020 May 5;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00864-9.
7
Assessment of Explicitly Stated Interval Change on Noncontrast Head CT Radiology Reports.头 CT 平扫放射学报告中明确表述的间隔变化评估。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):1091-1094. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6081. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Creating high-quality radiology reports in foreign languages through multilingual structured reporting.通过多语言结构化报告创建高质量的外文放射科报告。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):6038-6048. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06206-8. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
9
Radiology report format preferred by requesting physicians: prospective analysis in a population of physicians at a university hospital.请求医生偏好的放射学报告格式:对一所大学医院的医生群体进行的前瞻性分析。
Radiol Bras. 2019 Mar-Apr;52(2):97-103. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0026.
10
Automated Generation of Radiologic Descriptions on Brain Volume Changes From T1-Weighted MR Images: Initial Assessment of Feasibility.基于T1加权磁共振图像的脑容量变化自动生成放射学描述:可行性初步评估
Front Neurol. 2019 Jan 24;10:7. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00007. eCollection 2019.