Honma Naoko, Horii Rie, Iwase Takuji, Saji Shigehira, Younes Mamoun, Takubo Kaiyo, Matsuura Masaaki, Ito Yoshinori, Akiyama Futoshi, Sakamoto Goi
Research Team for Geriatric Diseases, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3727-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2968.
The clinicopathologic importance of a second estrogen receptor (ER), ER-beta, in breast cancers has been intensely studied; however, there is still no real consensus regarding the clinical utility of an ER-beta assay, probably because of the lack of standardized methodology, the presence of several ER-beta isotypes (ER-beta1-5, and so on), and, more importantly, the lack of convincing data on whether the ER-beta status provides clinically useful information over what is already provided by the traditional ER-alpha/progesterone receptor (PR) assay. A large and systematic study is needed to address these important issues.
Archival materials of 442 invasive breast cancers from women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy and with a long follow-up period (median, 11.1 years) were subjected to immunohistochemical study using three commercially available anti-ER-beta antibodies that detect ER-beta1-3 (ER-betaN), ER-beta1, and ER-betacx (ER-beta2).
Positive staining for ER-betaN or ER-beta1 was associated with significantly better survival. By contrast, ER-betacx status did not influence survival. In multivariate analysis, ER-beta1 status emerged as an independent predictor of recurrence and mortality. ER-beta1 status was significantly associated with survival in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women. Importantly, ER-beta1 positivity was associated with significantly better survival in patients with ER-alpha-negative/PR-negative or ER-alpha-negative/PR-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (triple-negative) tumors, which are widely believed to be hormone unresponsive, have poor prognosis, and require chemotherapy.
Immunohistochemical examination of ER-beta1 in addition to ER-alpha and PR is clinically important in patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen monotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
已对乳腺癌中第二种雌激素受体(ER)——ER-β的临床病理重要性展开了深入研究;然而,对于ER-β检测的临床实用性仍未达成真正共识,这可能是由于缺乏标准化方法、存在多种ER-β同种型(如ER-β1 - 5等),更重要的是,缺乏令人信服的数据表明ER-β状态是否能提供超越传统ER-α/孕激素受体(PR)检测所提供的临床有用信息。需要进行大规模的系统性研究来解决这些重要问题。
对442例接受辅助他莫昔芬单一疗法治疗且随访期较长(中位随访期为11.1年)的女性浸润性乳腺癌存档材料,使用三种可商购的抗ER-β抗体进行免疫组织化学研究,这些抗体可检测ER-β1 - 3(ER-βN)、ER-β1和ER-βcx(ER-β2)。
ER-βN或ER-β1阳性染色与显著更好的生存率相关。相比之下,ER-βcx状态不影响生存率。在多变量分析中,ER-β1状态成为复发和死亡率的独立预测因素。ER-β1状态在绝经后女性而非绝经前女性中与生存率显著相关。重要的是,ER-β1阳性与ER-α阴性/PR阴性或ER-α阴性/PR阴性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(三阴性)肿瘤患者的显著更好生存率相关,这些肿瘤被广泛认为对激素无反应、预后较差且需要化疗。
对于接受他莫昔芬单一疗法治疗的乳腺癌患者,除了检测ER-α和PR外,对ER-β1进行免疫组织化学检查具有临床重要性。需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现。