• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的疼痛、生活质量及恢复情况

Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

作者信息

Eriksen J R, Poornoroozy P, Jørgensen L N, Jacobsen B, Friis-Andersen H U, Rosenberg J

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology D, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Hernia. 2009 Feb;13(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0414-9. Epub 2008 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-008-0414-9
PMID:18670733
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is a well established procedure in the treatment of ventral hernias. It is our clinical experience that patients suffer intense postoperative pain, but this issue and other recovery parameters have not been studied in detail.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with hernias >3 cm prospectively underwent LVHR using "double-crown" titanium tack mesh fixation. Pre- and postoperative pain was measured on a 0-100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and health-related quality of life was measured using the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36). Several other recovery parameters were measured systematically in the 6 months follow-up period.

RESULTS

We observed no recurrences or severe complications in the follow-up period (n = 31 at day 30 and n = 28 after 6 months). The median in-hospital stay was 2 days (range 0-5). Patients reported significantly more pain during activity than at rest at all times (p < 0.05). The median VAS-pain score during activity vs. at rest at discharge was 60 and 31, respectively. The median VAS-pain score during activity on the day of operation (day 0) was 78; it returned to baseline values at day 30 (p = 0.148) and, after 6 months, it was below the preoperative score (p = 0.01). The scores for general well-being and fatigue returned to baseline values at days 3 and 30, respectively, and at 6 months, they had both significantly improved compared with preoperative values (p = 0.005). The SF-36 scores were significantly worse in three domains at day 30 (p < 0.005). After 6 months, the bodily pain score had increased significantly compared with preoperative values (p < 0.005) and all eight scales were comparable to the Danish reference population scores. Patients resumed normal daily activities after a median of 14 days (range 1-38). Smokers and patients with hard physical demands at work took a significantly longer amount of time to resume work compared with non-smokers (30 vs. 9 days, p < 0.005) and patients with light work demands (29 vs. 9 days, p < 0.05), respectively. VAS-pain scores were strongly correlated to general well-being (r = -0.8, p < 0.001), patient satisfaction (r = -0.67, p < 0.001) and quality of life (r = -0.63, p < 0.001). We found no significant correlation between the number of tacks used (median 59) and postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

LVHR was associated with considerable postoperative pain and fatigue in the first postoperative month, prolonging the time of convalescence and significantly affecting patients' quality of life up to 6 months postoperatively. Mesh fixation with fibrin glue or other non-invasive/degradable products seems promising for reducing pain and it should be investigated in future randomised trials.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜腹疝修补术(LVHR)是治疗腹疝的一种成熟手术。我们的临床经验是患者术后会遭受剧烈疼痛,但这个问题以及其他恢复参数尚未得到详细研究。

方法

35例疝大于3 cm的患者前瞻性地接受了使用“双冠”钛钉网片固定的LVHR。术前和术后疼痛采用0 - 100 mm视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量,健康相关生活质量采用简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)进行测量。在6个月的随访期内系统地测量了其他几个恢复参数。

结果

在随访期内(30天时n = 31,6个月后n = 28)未观察到复发或严重并发症。中位住院时间为2天(范围0 - 5天)。患者在活动期间报告的疼痛始终显著多于休息时(p < 0.05)。出院时活动期间与休息时的中位VAS疼痛评分分别为60和31。手术当天(第0天)活动期间的中位VAS疼痛评分为78;在第30天恢复到基线值(p = 0.148),6个月后低于术前评分(p = 0.01)。总体健康和疲劳评分分别在第3天和第30天恢复到基线值,6个月时与术前值相比均有显著改善(p = 0.005)。在第30天,SF - 36评分在三个领域显著更差(p < 0.005)。6个月后,身体疼痛评分与术前值相比显著增加(p < 0.005),所有八个量表与丹麦参考人群评分相当。患者中位14天(范围1 - 38天)后恢复正常日常活动。与非吸烟者(30天对9天,p < 0.005)和工作体力要求轻的患者(29天对9天,p < 0.05)相比,吸烟者和工作体力要求高的患者恢复工作的时间明显更长。VAS疼痛评分与总体健康(r = -0.8,p < 0.001)、患者满意度(r = -0.67,p < 0.001)和生活质量(r = -0.63,p < 0.001)密切相关。我们发现使用的钛钉数量(中位59个)与术后疼痛之间无显著相关性。

结论

LVHR在术后第一个月与相当程度的术后疼痛和疲劳相关,延长了康复时间,并在术后6个月内显著影响患者的生活质量。用纤维蛋白胶或其他非侵入性/可降解产品进行网片固定在减轻疼痛方面似乎很有前景,应在未来的随机试验中进行研究。

相似文献

1
Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的疼痛、生活质量及恢复情况
Hernia. 2009 Feb;13(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0414-9. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
2
Pain and convalescence following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的疼痛与康复
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Dec;58(12):B4369.
3
Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with "double crown" versus "sutures and tackers" in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.随机临床试验:网片固定采用“双帽”与“缝线和钉枪”在腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术中的比较。
Hernia. 2013 Oct;17(5):603-12. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1084-9. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
4
Long-term quality of life and functionality after ventral hernia mesh repair.腹疝补片修补术后的长期生活质量和功能
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):5023-5033. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4850-9. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
5
Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant versus titanium tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair.随机临床试验:纤维蛋白胶与钛钉在腹腔镜脐疝修补术中固定补片的比较。
Br J Surg. 2011 Nov;98(11):1537-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7646. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
6
Long-term Outcome on the use of the Ventralight™ ST Hernia Patch in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.Ventralight™ ST疝修补片在腹腔镜腹疝修补术中应用的长期疗效
Surg Technol Int. 2015 May;26:157-61.
7
Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques.网片固定方法与腹腔镜腹侧或切口疝修补术后疼痛和生活质量:三种固定技术的随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
8
Effect of fixation devices on postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial of permanent tacks, absorbable tacks, and synthetic glue.固定装置对腹腔镜腹疝修补术后疼痛的影响:永久性缝钉、可吸收缝钉及合成胶水的一项随机临床试验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Jun;403(4):529-537. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1676-z. Epub 2018 May 25.
9
Pain and Surgical Outcomes Reporting After Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair in Relation to Mesh Fixation Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后疼痛与手术结局报告与补片固定技术的关系:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Nov;28(11):1298-1315. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0609. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
TACKoMesh - A randomised controlled trial comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable tack fixation in laparoscopic IPOM + repair of primary incisional hernia using post-operative pain and quality of life - Reliatack™ versus Protack™.TACKoMesh- 一项比较可吸收与不可吸收缝线固定在腹腔镜 IPOM+原发性切口疝修补术中的随机对照试验,比较术后疼痛和生活质量- ReliatackTM 与 ProtackTM。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1879-1888. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03111-y. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus intraperitoneal onlay Mesh (IPOM) for ventral hernia repair - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM)治疗腹疝的比较——一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Feb 15;29(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03271-5.
2
A comparative study between ETEP vs. IPOM repair for ventral hernia.经脐单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术(ETEP)与腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)治疗腹疝的对比研究
Hernia. 2025 Feb 7;29(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03280-4.
3
Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM +) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (Tisseel) vs. titanium tacks: a randomised controlled experimental study in pigs.腹腔镜下使用纤维蛋白胶(Tisseel)与钛钉进行腹腔内补片固定:一项在猪身上进行的随机对照实验研究
Hernia. 2008 Oct;12(5):483-91. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0375-z. Epub 2008 May 16.
2
Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术后疼痛:缝线与钉合器的前瞻性比较
JSLS. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):113-6.
3
Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
微创腹腔内补片植入术联合(IPOM+)修补术与增强视野完全腹膜外(e-TEP)修补术治疗腹疝的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1251-1260. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11377-7. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
4
The association of permanent versus absorbable fixation on developing chronic post-herniorrhaphy groin pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后永久性与可吸收固定对慢性腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3433-3440. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10866-z. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
The effect of somatic pain and comorbid mental distress on oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients.躯体疼痛和共病精神困扰对正畸患者口腔健康相关生活质量的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 3;28(5):296. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05666-7.
6
A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic IPOM plus.腹腔镜引导下腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜 IPOM 加手术患者有效性的随机对照试验。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1257-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03016-w. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
A randomised control trial study of early post-operative pain and intraoperative surgeon workload following laparoscopic mesh repair of midline ventral hernia by enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus approach.一项关于通过增强视野完全腹膜外和腹膜内补片覆盖加 approach 法进行腹腔镜中线腹疝修补术后早期疼痛和术中外科医生工作量的随机对照试验研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(3):427-432. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_32_23.
8
Assessment of Quality of Life After Ventral Hernia Repair: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Centre.腹疝修补术后生活质量评估:在三级护理中心进行的一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 20;14(6):e26136. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26136. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
TAP Block Prior to Open Ventral Hernia Repair Improves Surgical Outcome.TAP 阻滞在开放腹疝修补术前应用可改善手术结局。
World J Surg. 2022 Jun;46(6):1383-1388. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06508-x. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy in a middle-aged Japanese woman: an initial case report after 40 years of experience at a single center and a brief literature review.腹腔镜输卵管卵巢切除术治疗中年日本女性的trocar 部位疝:单中心 40 年经验的首例病例报告及文献复习
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01528-6.
腹腔镜腹疝修补术补片的选择
Hernia. 2007 Dec;11(6):481-92. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0282-8. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
4
Are mesh anchoring sutures necessary in ventral hernioplasty? Multicenter study.腹疝修补术中是否需要网片锚定缝线?多中心研究。
Hernia. 2007 Dec;11(6):501-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0260-1. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
5
Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中疼痛的量化显示了不同假体固定系统之间的显著差异。
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.013.
6
Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study.腹腔镜与开放切口疝修补术:一项开放性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):555-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9229-5. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
7
Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study.在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中使用人纤维蛋白胶(Tissucol)与吻合钉进行补片固定的前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Surg. 2007 Feb;245(2):222-31. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245832.59478.c6.
8
Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.使用轻质补片改善疝修补术的疗效——基于文献批判性评估对不同植入物结构的比较
World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):234-44. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0123-4.
9
Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects: preliminary experience.纤维蛋白胶(Tissucol)在腹腔镜腹壁缺损修补术中的应用:初步经验
Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):409-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9108-5. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
10
The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Hernia. 2007 Feb;11(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0160-9. Epub 2006 Nov 28.