Lie R K
Center for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Norway.
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1991;599:135-47.
This paper examines the evidence for and against the various rival theories for the explanation of pain in angina pectoris. It is shown that the counterarguments used during the 1920s against the coronary theory had not been answered a decade later when the coronary theory was generally accepted by the research and clinical community.
本文考察了支持和反对用于解释心绞痛疼痛的各种相互竞争理论的证据。结果表明，20世纪20年代针对冠状动脉理论提出的反驳观点，在十年后冠状动脉理论被研究和临床界普遍接受时仍未得到解答。
