Raiyawa Supaluk, Jenchitr Watanee, Yenjitr Chawewan, Tapunya Mongkhol
Department of Ophthalmology, Udornthanee Hospital, Muang District, Udornthanee, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91 Suppl 1:S92-101.
Question of different techniques of cataract surgery would offer different post-operative visual acuity (VA) has been asked.
To compare the pre-and post-operative VA of cataract patients operated by different techniques as Extracapsular Cataract Extraction (ECCE), Phacoemulsification (PE), and Manual Phaco Fragmentation (MPF) and compare in different age groups.
The post-operative visual acuity of cataract patients was collected from 72 hospitals in Bangkok and rural part of Thailand. Techniques of cataract surgery were recorded. The cases with pre-operative and intraoperative complication and cases operated without intraocular lens (IOLs) implantation were ruled out.
VA of cataract patients post-operation was statistically significant better than pre-operation at p-value (less than 0.05) and the result persisted for every age group. Cataract patients operated by PE had better post-operative VA than patients operated by ECCE and MPF even if MPF had the best post-operative VA. This is because the total cases were less than the other procedure.
Due to the nature of retrospective study, the cause of poor post-operative VA was due to astigmatism. The pre-operative astigmatism was not recorded thus preventing a complete analysis.
白内障手术的不同技术是否会带来不同的术后视力这一问题已被提出。
比较采用不同技术(如囊外白内障摘除术(ECCE)、超声乳化白内障吸除术(PE)和手动超声乳化碎核术(MPF))进行手术的白内障患者术前和术后的视力,并在不同年龄组中进行比较。
从曼谷和泰国农村地区的72家医院收集白内障患者的术后视力情况。记录白内障手术技术。排除术前和术中出现并发症以及未植入人工晶状体(IOL)的病例。
白内障患者术后视力在p值(小于0.05)时统计学上显著优于术前,且该结果在每个年龄组中均持续存在。即使MPF术后视力最佳,但接受PE手术的白内障患者术后视力仍优于接受ECCE和MPF手术的患者。这是因为MPF的病例总数少于其他手术。
由于回顾性研究的性质,术后视力不佳的原因是散光。术前散光未记录,因此无法进行完整分析。