Pelias M Z
Department of Biometry and Genetics, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112.
Am J Med Genet. 1991 Jun 1;39(3):347-54. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320390320.
As technical knowledge and public information in medical genetics continue to expand, the geneticist may expect to be held responsible for informing patients and clients about new developments in research and diagnosis. The long legal evolution of the physician's duty to disclose, and more recent findings of a physician's duty to recall former patients to inform them about newly discovered risks of treatment, indicate that medical geneticists may have a duty to disclose both current and future information about conditions that are or could be inherited. Recent case law supports findings of professional liability for both present and future disclosure, even in the absence of an active physician-patient relationship. The requirement of candid and complete disclosure will affect the counseling approach in testing for deleterious genes and in providing medical treatment for minors with hereditary diseases. Finding a duty to recall may impose further professional burdens on the geneticist to reach beyond the immediate counseling arena and to recontact patients, perhaps years after their initial visit to genetics clinic.
随着医学遗传学领域的技术知识和公共信息不断扩展,遗传学家可能会被要求负责向患者和客户通报研究和诊断方面的新进展。医生告知义务的漫长法律演变过程,以及近期关于医生有义务召回 former patients 以告知他们新发现的治疗风险的研究结果表明,医学遗传学家可能有义务披露有关当前和未来可能遗传的病症的信息。近期的判例法支持了对当前和未来披露的职业责任认定,即使在不存在活跃的医患关系的情况下也是如此。坦诚和全面披露的要求将影响对有害基因检测的咨询方法,以及为患有遗传性疾病的未成年人提供医疗治疗的方式。认定召回义务可能会给遗传学家带来进一步的职业负担,使其工作范围超越即时咨询领域,并在患者首次就诊遗传诊所数年之后重新联系他们。 (注:原文中“former patients”表述有误,可能是“former patients”,推测应该是“former patients”即“以前的患者” )