Polgár E, Todd A J
Spinal Cord Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences, West Medical Building, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Neuroscience. 2008 Sep 22;156(1):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
Although there is evidence that reduced inhibition in the spinal dorsal horn contributes to neuropathic pain, the mechanisms that underlie this are poorly understood. We have previously demonstrated that there is no loss of neurons from laminae I-III in the spared nerve injury (SNI) model [Polgár E, Hughes DI, Arham AZ, Todd AJ (2005) Loss of neurons from laminas I-III of the spinal dorsal horn is not required for development of tactile allodynia in the SNI model of neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 25:6658-6666]. In this study we investigated whether there was a difference between ipsilateral and contralateral sides in the levels of GABA, the vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT), or the beta3 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor at synapses in the medial part of the superficial dorsal horn in this model. Tissue from rats that had undergone SNI 4 weeks previously was examined with an electron microscopic immunogold method to reveal GABA, following pre-embedding detection of GABA(A) beta3 to allow identification of GABAergic terminals. Assessment of labeling for the GABA(A) beta3 subunit and VGAT was performed by using immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. We found no difference in the intensity of immunolabeling for any of these markers on the two sides of the superficial dorsal horn. These results suggest that there is no significant loss of GABAergic boutons from the denervated area after SNI (which is consistent with the finding that neuronal death does not occur in this model) and that there is no depletion of GABA or GABA(A) receptors at GABAergic synapses within this region. An alternative explanation for disinhibition after nerve injury is that it results from reduced excitatory drive to GABAergic dorsal horn neurons following loss of primary afferent input to these cells.
尽管有证据表明脊髓背角抑制作用减弱会导致神经性疼痛,但其潜在机制仍知之甚少。我们之前已经证明,在 spared nerve injury(SNI)模型中,I-III层的神经元没有丢失[Polgár E, Hughes DI, Arham AZ, Todd AJ(2005年)。在SNI神经性疼痛模型中,脊髓背角I-III层神经元的丢失并非触觉异常性疼痛发展所必需。《神经科学杂志》25:6658 - 6666]。在本研究中,我们调查了在该模型中,浅表背角内侧部分突触处的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)、囊泡GABA转运体(VGAT)或GABA(A)受体的β3亚基水平在同侧和对侧之间是否存在差异。对4周前接受过SNI的大鼠组织采用电子显微镜免疫金法检测GABA,在预包埋检测GABA(A)β3后,以识别GABA能终末。通过免疫荧光和共聚焦显微镜对GABA(A)β3亚基和VGAT的标记进行评估。我们发现浅表背角两侧这些标志物的免疫标记强度没有差异。这些结果表明,SNI后去神经支配区域的GABA能突触小体没有显著丢失(这与该模型中未发生神经元死亡的发现一致),并且该区域内GABA能突触处的GABA或GABA(A)受体没有耗竭。神经损伤后去抑制的另一种解释是,它是由于这些细胞的初级传入输入丧失后,对GABA能背角神经元的兴奋性驱动降低所致。