Queiroz-Telles Flavio, Berezin Eitan, Leverger Guy, Freire Antonio, van der Vyver Annalie, Chotpitayasunondh Tawee, Konja Josip, Diekmann-Berndt Heike, Koblinger Sonja, Groll Andreas H, Arrieta Antonio
Hosp de Clinica, Curitiba, Brazil.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Sep;27(9):820-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31817275e6.
Invasive candidiasis is increasingly prevalent in premature infants and seriously ill children, and pediatric data on available antifungal therapies are lacking.
We conducted a pediatric substudy as part of a double-blind, randomized, multinational trial to compare micafungin (2 mg/kg) with liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg) as first-line treatment of invasive candidiasis. Treatment success was defined as clinical and mycologic response at the end of therapy. Statistical analyses were descriptive, as the sample size meant that the study was not powered for hypothesis testing.
One hundred six patients were included in the intent-to-treat population; and 98 patients-48 patients in the micafungin group and 50 patients in the liposomal amphotericin B group-in the modified intent-to-treat population. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. Overall, 57 patients were <2 years old including 19 patients who were premature at birth; and 41 patients were 2 to <16 years old. Most patients (91/98, 92.9%) had candidemia, and 7/98 (7.1%) patients had other forms of invasive candidiasis. Treatment success was observed for 35/48 (72.9%) patients treated with micafungin and 38/50 (76.0%) patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B. The difference in proportions adjusted for neutropenic status was -2.4% [95% CI: (-20.1 to 15.3)]. Efficacy findings were consistent, independent of the neutropenic status, the age of the patient, and whether the patient was premature at birth. Both treatments were well tolerated, but with a lower incidence of adverse events that led to discontinuation in the micafungin group (2/52, 3.8%) compared with the liposomal amphotericin B group (9/54, 16.7%) (P = 0.05, Fisher exact test).
Micafungin seems to be similarly effective and as safe as liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in pediatric patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00106288).
侵袭性念珠菌病在早产儿和重症儿童中日益普遍,且缺乏关于现有抗真菌治疗的儿科数据。
我们开展了一项儿科子研究,作为一项双盲、随机、多国试验的一部分,以比较米卡芬净(2mg/kg)与两性霉素B脂质体(3mg/kg)作为侵袭性念珠菌病的一线治疗方案。治疗成功定义为治疗结束时的临床和真菌学反应。统计分析为描述性分析,因为样本量意味着该研究没有足够的效力进行假设检验。
意向性分析人群纳入了106例患者;改良意向性分析人群纳入了98例患者,其中米卡芬净组48例,两性霉素B脂质体组50例。治疗组间基线特征均衡。总体而言,57例患者年龄小于2岁,其中19例为早产儿;41例患者年龄为2至<16岁。大多数患者(91/98,92.9%)患有念珠菌血症,7/98(7.1%)例患者患有其他形式的侵袭性念珠菌病。接受米卡芬净治疗的35/48(72.9%)例患者和接受两性霉素B脂质体治疗的38/50(76.0%)例患者观察到治疗成功。根据中性粒细胞减少状态调整后的比例差异为-2.4%[95%CI:(-20.1至15.3)]。疗效结果一致,与中性粒细胞减少状态、患者年龄以及患者是否为早产儿无关。两种治疗耐受性均良好,但米卡芬净组导致停药的不良事件发生率(2/52,3.8%)低于两性霉素B脂质体组(9/54,16.7%)(P = 0.05,Fisher精确检验)。
对于儿科患者侵袭性念珠菌病的治疗,米卡芬净似乎与两性霉素B脂质体同样有效且安全。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00106288)