The diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia on curettage: how reliable is it?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the consistency of preoperative and postoperative histological findings in cases of endometrial hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with endometrial hyperplasia detected by surgical curettage were treated by hysterectomy. The histopathological diagnoses found on curettage specimens were compared and correlated with those found on hysterectomy. Endometrial hyperplasia was classified according to the classification scheme of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia on curettage specimens performed for evaluation of various bleeding abnormalities. The average age of the patients was 51.8 years (range 35-74). Thirty patients (55%) were postmenopausal. The interval between curettage and hysterectomy was 1-33 weeks. Of the patients, 26 (47%) had simple hyperplasia, 24 (44%) complex hyperplasia and 5 patients (9%) had complex atypical hyperplasia. Histopathological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens of these patients showed a total number of 35 cases (64%) with endometrial hyperplasia, 1 case of endometrial carcinoma and 19 cases with other pathological findings. The consistency rate between curettage and hysterectomy specimens was 45% (25/55 cases). Following hysterectomy, we found that none of the 26 simple hyperplasia cases and only one of the 24 complex hyperplasia cases coexisted with endometrial carcinoma. On the other hand, three of the five cases of complex atypical carcinoma coexisted with endometrial carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Curettage endometrial pathology tends to be more consistent with final hysterectomy pathology in simple hyperplasia. However, in cases of complex hyperplasia with atypia, curettage seems to under diagnose the real pathology.