Buscaglia C, Calnek B W, Schat K A
Department of Avian and Aquatic Animal Medicine, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Avian Pathol. 1989 Apr;18(2):265-81. doi: 10.1080/03079458908418601.
Birds infected with reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) were exposed to Marek's disease virus (MDV) to determine if the establishment of MDV latency was affected by REV-induced immunosuppression, while other chickens, already latently infected with MDV, were challenged with REV or infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) to determine if the consequent immunosuppression caused a return to cytolytic infection. Immunosuppression was assessed by in vitro mitogen stimulation assays with spleen cells. Latently MDV-infected cells were free of viral internal antigen(s) (VIA) but could be identified by their ability to produce VIA after in vitro cultivation. The results were unexpected: chickens infected with either of these viruses had very low, and often undetectable, levels of MDV infection when compared with appropriate controls. REV infection interfered with early cytolytic MDV infection, and IBDV and REV both failed to activate latent MDV infection in the face of inferred (IBDV) or demonstrated (REV) immunosuppression by these viruses. Apparently, both viruses reduced the number of MDV infected cells since neither cytolytic nor latent infection could be demonstrated. This was based on an absence of cells with VIA either before or after cultivation and, in the case of REV infection, on failure to detect MDV-DNA using a dot-blot hybridisation technique.
将感染网状内皮组织增生症病毒(REV)的鸡暴露于马立克氏病病毒(MDV),以确定MDV潜伏状态的建立是否受REV诱导的免疫抑制影响;同时,对已潜伏感染MDV的其他鸡,用REV或传染性法氏囊病病毒(IBDV)进行攻毒,以确定随之而来的免疫抑制是否会导致细胞溶解性感染复发。通过用脾细胞进行体外丝裂原刺激试验评估免疫抑制情况。潜伏感染MDV的细胞不含病毒内部抗原(VIA),但可通过其在体外培养后产生VIA的能力来识别。结果出乎意料:与适当的对照相比,感染这两种病毒之一的鸡的MDV感染水平非常低,且常常检测不到。REV感染干扰了MDV早期的细胞溶解性感染,并且面对这些病毒推断的(IBDV)或证实的(REV)免疫抑制,IBDV和REV均未能激活潜伏的MDV感染。显然,这两种病毒都减少了MDV感染细胞的数量,因为既未证明有细胞溶解性感染也未证明有潜伏感染。这是基于培养前后均没有含VIA的细胞,并且就REV感染而言,是基于使用斑点杂交技术未能检测到MDV-DNA。