• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量与结果框架实施前后,诊所规模对糖尿病护理服务的影响。

Impact of practice size on delivery of diabetes care before and after the Quality and Outcomes Framework implementation.

作者信息

Tahrani Abd A, McCarthy Mary, Godson Jojo, Taylor Sarah, Slater Helen, Capps Nigel, Moulik Probal, Macleod Andrew F

机构信息

Division of Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Aug;58(553):576-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319729.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp08X319729
PMID:18682020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2486384/
Abstract

General practice characteristics are important for healthcare providers to maximise outcomes. Although different aspects of general practice characteristics have been studied previously, the impact of practice size on the delivery of care has been sparsely studied, particularly in relation to diabetes care. This brief report presents a longitudinal study in Shropshire (66 practices, 16,858 patients with diabetes) to assess the impact of practice size on diabetes care before and after implementation of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Achievement of glycaemic control targets was better before the QOF for larger as compared to smaller practices (P=0.02 and P=0.003 for haemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]<or=7.4% and 10% respectively). This difference disappeared following QOF implementation. Repeated measures analysis showed significant improvement in achieving glycaemic control targets following QOF implementation in both large and small practices (P<0.001 for HbA1c<or=7.4% and 10%). The study failed to reveal an impact of practice size on achieving the HbA1c target<or=7.4% (P=0.1) by this analysis. However, it did show an impact on reaching the target of HbA1c<10% (P=0.04) in favour of smaller practices. There was a significant difference in favour of smaller practices for achievement of prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P=0.001).

摘要

全科医疗特征对于医疗服务提供者实现最佳治疗效果非常重要。尽管此前已经对全科医疗特征的不同方面进行了研究,但诊所规模对医疗服务提供的影响却鲜有研究,尤其是在糖尿病护理方面。本简要报告介绍了在什罗普郡进行的一项纵向研究(66家诊所,16858名糖尿病患者),以评估在实施质量与结果框架(QOF)前后诊所规模对糖尿病护理的影响。与规模较小的诊所相比,在QOF实施之前,规模较大的诊所实现血糖控制目标的情况更好(糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]≤7.4%和≤10%时,P分别为0.02和0.003)。QOF实施后,这种差异消失了。重复测量分析表明,在QOF实施后,无论大诊所还是小诊所,实现血糖控制目标均有显著改善(HbA1c≤7.4%和≤10%时,P均<0.001)。通过该分析,研究未能揭示诊所规模对实现HbA1c≤7.4%目标的影响(P=0.1)。然而,研究确实表明,在实现HbA1c<10%的目标方面,规模较小的诊所有影响(P=0.04)。在开具血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂处方的达成情况上,规模较小的诊所具有显著优势(P=0.001)。

相似文献

1
Impact of practice size on delivery of diabetes care before and after the Quality and Outcomes Framework implementation.质量与结果框架实施前后,诊所规模对糖尿病护理服务的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Aug;58(553):576-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319729.
2
Diabetes care and the new GMS contract: the evidence for a whole county.糖尿病护理与新的全科医生服务合同:一个县的相关证据
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jun;57(539):483-5.
3
Achievement of metabolic targets for diabetes by English primary care practices under a new system of incentives.英国基层医疗实践在新激励体系下实现糖尿病代谢指标达标情况
Diabet Med. 2007 May;24(5):505-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02090.x. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
4
Diabetes prevalence, process of care and outcomes in relation to practice size, caseload and deprivation: national cross-sectional study in primary care.糖尿病患病率、医疗过程及与诊所规模、病例数量和贫困程度相关的结局:初级医疗的全国横断面研究
J R Soc Med. 2007 Jun;100(6):275-83. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000613.
5
Practice size, caseload, deprivation and quality of care of patients with coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke in primary care: national cross-sectional study.初级保健中冠心病、高血压和中风患者的医疗机构规模、病例数量、贫困状况及护理质量:全国横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 27;7:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-96.
6
Practice size and quality attainment under the new GMS contract: a cross-sectional analysis.新全科医生服务合同下的诊所规模与质量达标情况:一项横断面分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov;56(532):830-5.
7
Performance of small general practices under the UK's Quality and Outcomes Framework.英国质量与结果框架下的小型全科医疗实践表现。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Sep;60(578):e335-44. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X515340.
8
Nurse staffing and quality of care in UK general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely collected data.英国普通实践中的护士人员配备和护理质量:使用常规收集数据的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jan;60(570):36-48. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X482086.
9
The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5.全科医疗特征与医疗质量之间的关系:对2004 - 2005年英国质量与结果框架中使用的质量指标的全国性调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Nov 13;7:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-68.
10
Differences in the quality of primary medical care services by remoteness from urban settlements.根据与城市定居点的距离,初级医疗服务质量存在差异。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):446-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020875.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Physician and Practice Characteristics in the Quality of Diabetes Management in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.初级保健中医生及执业特征对糖尿病管理质量的作用:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1836-1848. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05676-7. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
A reporting framework for describing and a typology for categorizing and analyzing the designs of health care pay for performance schemes.一个用于描述医疗保健绩效薪酬计划设计的报告框架以及用于对其进行分类和分析的类型学。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3479-x.
3
Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.英国供应商财务激励措施对医疗质量的影响:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e800-e815. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693149. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Role of Patient and Practice Characteristics in Variance of Treatment Quality in Type 2 Diabetes between General Practices.患者及诊所特征在全科诊所2型糖尿病治疗质量差异中的作用
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 2;11(11):e0166012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166012. eCollection 2016.
5
History Bias, Study Design, and the Unfulfilled Promise of Pay-for-Performance Policies in Health Care.历史偏差、研究设计与医疗保健中绩效薪酬政策未兑现的承诺。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 23;13:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160133.
6
Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.医疗保健中的实施过程与绩效薪酬:系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):61-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3567-0.
7
The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.评价质量和结果框架中的公平性维度:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 31;11:209. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-209.
8
Association of practice size and pay-for-performance incentives with the quality of diabetes management in primary care.实践规模和按绩效付费激励与初级保健中糖尿病管理质量的关联。
CMAJ. 2011 Sep 6;183(12):E809-16. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101187. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
9
Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.系统评价:医疗保健中绩效付费的效果、设计选择和背景。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 23;10:247. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes care and the new GMS contract: the evidence for a whole county.糖尿病护理与新的全科医生服务合同:一个县的相关证据
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jun;57(539):483-5.
2
Practice size and quality attainment under the new GMS contract: a cross-sectional analysis.新全科医生服务合同下的诊所规模与质量达标情况:一项横断面分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov;56(532):830-5.
3
Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom.将医生薪酬与医疗质量挂钩——英国的一项重大试验。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1448-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr041294.
4
Paying physicians for high-quality care.为高质量医疗服务支付医生报酬。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):406-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb035374.
5
Practice size: impact on consultation length, workload, and patient assessment of care.诊所规模:对会诊时长、工作量及患者护理评估的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Aug;51(469):644-50.
6
Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes.与糖尿病患者护理过程和结果差异相关的初级保健特征。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 May;51(466):356-60.
7
Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care?糖尿病控制的影响因素:患者、医生、医疗实践还是医疗服务的提供?
BMJ. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):630-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.630.