Flemming Jennifer, Madarnas Yolanda, Franek Jacob A
Department of Internal Medicine, Queen's University, Etherington Hall, Room 3040, 94 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 May;115(2):255-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0137-8. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
A systematic review was undertaken to examine all available evidence to develop and support clinical recommendations regarding the use of fulvestrant (Faslodex((R))) as systemic therapy of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. MEDLINE, EMBASE, American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting proceedings, San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposia proceedings, and the Cochrane Library were searched through to April of 2008 for reports of randomized controlled trials that met established inclusion criteria. Four relevant Phase III trials were available for inclusion based on established criteria. Three of four Phase III superiority trials found no significant difference between fulvestrant and control, either anastrozole or exemestane, across efficacy and safety endpoints following prior endocrine therapy failure, with two trials further confirming non-inferiority of fulvestrant to anastrozole retrospectively. Fulvestrant can therefore be considered as alternative therapy to anastrozole or exemestane in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has recurred on prior adjuvant endocrine therapy or progressed on prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease. There are, however, important methodological concerns across reviewed trials that should be taken under consideration as they may limit the strength of such a conclusion.
进行了一项系统综述,以审查所有现有证据,从而制定并支持关于使用氟维司群(芙仕得(R))作为绝经后妇女局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌全身治疗的临床建议。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、美国临床肿瘤学会年会论文集、圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集以及Cochrane图书馆,直至2008年4月,以查找符合既定纳入标准的随机对照试验报告。根据既定标准,有四项相关的III期试验可供纳入。四项III期优效性试验中的三项发现,在先前内分泌治疗失败后的疗效和安全性终点方面,氟维司群与对照药物阿那曲唑或依西美坦之间没有显著差异,两项试验进一步回顾性证实了氟维司群不劣于阿那曲唑。因此,对于先前辅助内分泌治疗后复发或先前晚期疾病内分泌治疗进展的绝经后局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌妇女,氟维司群可被视为阿那曲唑或依西美坦的替代疗法。然而,在所审查的试验中存在一些重要的方法学问题,应予以考虑,因为它们可能会限制这一结论的力度。