Gyawu P, Ducker M J, Pope G S, Saunders R W, Wilson G D
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead.
Br Vet J. 1991 Mar-Apr;147(2):171-82. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(91)90108-Y.
The relative merits of three hormone treatments of dairy cows: (1) intravaginally administered progesterone and oestradiol benzoate; (2) intravaginally administered progesterone and injected cloprostenol; and (3) injected cloprostenol; begun 35-75 days after calving and designed to synchronize oestrus and ovulation and allow successful artificial insemination (AI) at fixed times, have been assessed utilizing information from progesterone concentrations in milk. From this it was concluded that 89% of the cows had ovulated one to three times between calving and the beginning of treatment. Treatment (2) was more effective than (1) in synchronizing ovulation. This was due to the fact that when treatments began early in the ovulation cycle, the requirement for a rapidly effective luteolytic agent was provided by cloprostenol but not by oestradiol benzoate. Treatment (2) was also more effective than (3) in synchronizing ovulation. This is interpreted as meaning that progesterone treatment for 12 days had a beneficial effect in restoring normal cyclic ovarian function in the cows after calving. Whilst cloprostenol administered alone did not have this beneficial effect, there is no evidence that it had a detrimental effect. Based on all cows in treatment groups, the proportion that became pregnant to the fixed-time AI was significantly greater after treatment (2) than after (1), but when based on numbers of cows with synchronized ovulation, there were no significant differences among treatments in the proportions becoming pregnant. The progesterone/cloprostenol treatment had a disadvantage in that when begun during the 11-22 day period of the ovulation cycle, so resulting in a long, total period of suppression of ovulation (mean, 32.1 days), fertility to the fixed-time AI was poor despite effective synchronization of ovulation. Ovulation cycles immediately following the failed, fixed-time AI were normal, both in length and in maximum, luteal-phase progesterone concentration and indicated normal corpus luteum function. Thus the infertility could be ascribed neither to poor timing of AI nor to gross degeneration of follicles prior to their synchronized ovulation following the prolonged suppression of ovulation. The 12-day progesterone treatments when given to anovulatory cows gave, within 5.5 h of their beginning, a concentration of progesterone in milk that was not significantly different from the maximum reached. This concentration declined during the 12 days of the treatment but remained above pretreatment level until 5.5 h after treatment withdrawal; the maximum reached was about half that in normal ovulation cycles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
(1)经阴道给予孕酮和苯甲酸雌二醇;(2)经阴道给予孕酮并注射氯前列醇;(3)注射氯前列醇。这些处理在产犊后35至75天开始,旨在同步发情和排卵,并允许在固定时间成功进行人工授精(AI)。利用牛奶中孕酮浓度的信息对其进行了评估。由此得出结论,89%的奶牛在产犊至处理开始期间排卵一至三次。处理(2)在同步排卵方面比(1)更有效。这是因为当在排卵周期早期开始处理时,氯前列醇能提供迅速有效的黄体溶解剂,而苯甲酸雌二醇则不能。处理(2)在同步排卵方面也比(3)更有效。这被解释为意味着12天的孕酮处理对恢复产犊后奶牛正常的周期性卵巢功能有有益作用。虽然单独给予氯前列醇没有这种有益作用,但没有证据表明它有有害作用。基于处理组中的所有奶牛,处理(2)后定时人工授精怀孕的比例显著高于(1),但基于排卵同步的奶牛数量,各处理在怀孕比例上没有显著差异。孕酮/氯前列醇处理有一个缺点,即在排卵周期的第11至22天开始时,导致排卵抑制的总时间很长(平均32.1天),尽管排卵有效同步,但定时人工授精的受胎率很低。失败的定时人工授精后紧接着的排卵周期在长度、黄体期孕酮浓度最大值方面均正常,表明黄体功能正常。因此,不孕症既不能归因于人工授精时间不当,也不能归因于在排卵长期受抑制后同步排卵前卵泡的严重退化。给不排卵的奶牛进行12天的孕酮处理后,在处理开始后5.5小时内,牛奶中的孕酮浓度与达到的最大值无显著差异。该浓度在处理的12天内下降,但在停药后5.5小时前一直高于处理前水平;达到的最大值约为正常排卵周期的一半。(摘要截选至400字)