Suppr超能文献

运动和噪音对肉鸡的厌恶性。

Aversiveness of motion and noise to broiler chickens.

作者信息

Nicol C J, Blakeborough A, Scott G B

机构信息

Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol, England.

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 1991 May;32(2):249-60. doi: 10.1080/00071669108417348.

Abstract
  1. The aversiveness of motion and noise to broiler chickens was examined using a passive avoidance technique. Birds were initially trained to peck a key a fixed number of times to obtain food. After training, food could still be obtained by key pecking, but feeding was immediately followed by 1 min exposure to noise or motion. Birds could delay or avoid exposure by delaying or avoiding key pecking, hence foregoing food. Reduced pecking rate was therefore taken as a measure of aversion. 2. In experiment 1, simultaneous motion and noise, but not noise alone, resulted in a significant decrease in pecking rate in comparison with baseline rates obtained after training. 3. In experiment 2 there was no significant difference in the pecking rates of 4 groups of broilers during training. However, after exposure to 1 of 4 types of motion, strongly significant differences in pecking rates were found between the groups. The mean latency to peak 3 times was significantly greater for birds exposed to gentle vibration, with a single jolt after 55 s, than for birds exposed to simple harmonic motion in either the horizontal or vertical plane. Birds exposed to circular motion in the horizontal plane had a significantly greater mean pecking latency than birds exposed to simple harmonic motion in the vertical plane. 4. Baseline latencies to keypeck in experiments 1 and 2 were longer than expected. In experiment 3 a direct comparison of baseline pecking was made between broilers and laying hens. The hens had significantly shorter pecking latencies.
摘要
  1. 采用被动回避技术研究了运动和噪音对肉鸡的厌恶性。最初训练鸟类按固定次数啄击按键以获取食物。训练后,仍可通过啄击按键获取食物,但喂食后紧接着会有1分钟的噪音或运动暴露。鸟类可以通过延迟或避免啄击按键来延迟或避免暴露,从而放弃食物。因此,啄击率的降低被视为厌恶的一种度量。2. 在实验1中,与训练后获得的基线率相比,同时存在的运动和噪音(而非单独的噪音)导致啄击率显著下降。3. 在实验2中,4组肉鸡在训练期间的啄击率没有显著差异。然而,在暴露于4种运动类型之一后,各实验组之间的啄击率存在极显著差异。暴露于轻柔振动(55秒后有一次震动)的鸟类达到3次峰值的平均潜伏期显著长于暴露于水平或垂直平面简单谐波运动的鸟类。暴露于水平面圆周运动的鸟类的平均啄击潜伏期显著长于暴露于垂直平面简单谐波运动的鸟类。4. 实验1和2中啄击按键的基线潜伏期比预期的要长。在实验3中,对肉鸡和蛋鸡的基线啄击进行了直接比较。蛋鸡的啄击潜伏期明显更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验