Moberly Nicholas J, Watkins Edward R
Mood Disorders Centre, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Sep;46(9):1034-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
Ruminative thinking is believed to exacerbate the psychological distress that follows stressful life events. An experience-sampling study was conducted in which participants recorded negative life events, ruminative self-focus, and negative affect eight times daily over one week. Occasions when participants reported a negative event were marked by higher levels of negative affect. Additionally, negative events were prospectively associated with higher levels of negative affect at the next sampling occasion, and this relationship was partially mediated by momentary ruminative self-focus. Depressive symptoms were associated with more frequent negative events, but not with increased reactivity to negative events. Trait rumination was associated with reports of more severe negative events and increased reactivity to negative events. These results suggest that the extent to which a person engages in ruminative self-focus after everyday stressors is an important determinant of the degree of distress experienced after such events. Further, dispositional measures of rumination predict mood reactivity to everyday stressors in a non-clinical sample.
反刍思维被认为会加剧应激性生活事件后的心理困扰。进行了一项经验取样研究,参与者在一周内每天记录八次负面生活事件、反刍性自我关注和负面情绪。参与者报告负面事件时,负面情绪水平较高。此外,负面事件在下次取样时与更高水平的负面情绪存在前瞻性关联,这种关系部分由瞬间的反刍性自我关注介导。抑郁症状与更频繁的负面事件相关,但与对负面事件反应性增加无关。特质反刍与更严重负面事件的报告以及对负面事件反应性增加相关。这些结果表明,一个人在日常应激源后进行反刍性自我关注的程度是此类事件后所经历困扰程度的重要决定因素。此外,反刍的倾向性测量可预测非临床样本中对日常应激源的情绪反应性。