Suppr超能文献

使用安抚奶嘴不会改变睡眠中婴儿自发觉醒的频率或时长。

Pacifier use does not alter the frequency or duration of spontaneous arousals in sleeping infants.

作者信息

Hanzer Marie, Zotter Heinz, Sauseng Werner, Pfurtscheller Klaus, Müller Wilhelm, Kerbl Reinhold

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 30, 8036 Graz, Styria, Austria.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2009 Apr;10(4):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It has been reported that pacifiers might reduce the risk of SIDS by favouring infants' arousability from sleep. We evaluated the influence of a pacifier on the frequency and duration of spontaneous arousals in healthy infants.

METHODS

Polygraphic recordings were performed in 14 infants with an age of 51.7+/-19.9 days (means+/-SD) who regularly used a pacifier during sleep. Cortical and subcortical arousals were scored according to the recommendations of the "International Paediatric Work Group on Arousals." The number of arousals per 10-min-period and the duration of arousals were determined for periods of pacifier use as well as for periods after pacifier dislodgement and were compared with the data of 10 control infants (age 49.8+/-16.5 days) who never used a pacifier.

RESULTS

Altogether, 211 arousals in pacifier users and 225 arousals in non-users were scored. In pacifier users, 2.0+/-1.6 arousals per 10-min-period with a duration of 12.2+/-3.0 s occurred during pacifier use, and 1.7+/-1.6 arousals per 10-min-period with a duration of 12.2+/-3.1s occurred during periods without pacifier. In pacifier non-users, 2.3+/-1.2 arousals per 10-min-period (duration 13.9+/-2.9s) were scored. The results did not show a significant difference concerning frequency and duration of spontaneous arousals between pacifier users and non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that factors other than arousal mechanisms might be responsible for the efficacy of pacifiers in SIDS prophylaxis.

摘要

目的

据报道,安抚奶嘴可能通过促进婴儿从睡眠中苏醒的能力来降低婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的风险。我们评估了安抚奶嘴对健康婴儿自发苏醒频率和持续时间的影响。

方法

对14名年龄为51.7±19.9天(均值±标准差)、睡眠时经常使用安抚奶嘴的婴儿进行多导记录。根据“国际儿科苏醒工作组”的建议对皮层和皮层下苏醒进行评分。确定使用安抚奶嘴期间以及取下安抚奶嘴后的每10分钟苏醒次数和苏醒持续时间,并与10名从未使用过安抚奶嘴的对照婴儿(年龄49.8±16.5天)的数据进行比较。

结果

共记录到使用安抚奶嘴婴儿的211次苏醒和未使用安抚奶嘴婴儿的225次苏醒。在使用安抚奶嘴的婴儿中,使用安抚奶嘴期间每10分钟有2.0±1.6次苏醒,持续时间为12.2±3.0秒,不使用安抚奶嘴期间每10分钟有1.7±1.6次苏醒,持续时间为12.2±3.1秒。在未使用安抚奶嘴的婴儿中,每10分钟有2.3±1.2次苏醒(持续时间13.9±2.9秒)。结果显示,使用安抚奶嘴和未使用安抚奶嘴的婴儿在自发苏醒频率和持续时间方面没有显著差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,除了苏醒机制外,其他因素可能是安抚奶嘴预防婴儿猝死综合征有效性的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验