Suppr超能文献

深覆合成年患者的颞下颌关节紊乱与心理状态

Temporomandibular disorders and psychological status in adult patients with a deep bite.

作者信息

Sonnesen Liselotte, Svensson Peter

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Universities of Copenhagen and Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):621-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn044. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

Abstract

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and psychological status were examined in adult patients with a deep bite and compared with an adult age- and gender-matched control group with neutral occlusion. The deep bite group consisted of 20 females (mean age 30.3 years) and 10 males (mean age 33.1 years). The control group comprised 20 females (mean age 29.4 years) and 10 males (mean age 34.2 years). TMD examination, according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD), cephalometric lateral radiographs, registration of occlusion, and bite force were performed. To test the mean differences between craniofacial morphology, bite force, the occurrence of RDC/TMD diagnostic groups, and headache between the two groups, unpaired t-test, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. Deep bite patients more frequently reported nocturnal and diurnal clenching (P < 0.01), an uncomfortable bite (P < 0.001), jaw stiffness (P < 0.05), and 'ringing' in the ears (P < 0.001) than the controls. Headache (P < 0.001), muscle disorders (P < 0.001), disc displacement (P < 0.05), and other joint disorders (P < 0.05) occurred significantly more often in the deep bite group compared with the controls. Somatization scores were significantly higher in the deep bite group compared with the controls (P < 0.001). Headache, muscle disorders, disc displacement, and other joint disorders were significantly associated with a number of craniofacial dimensions and psychological factors [R between 0.32 and 0.72; P < 0.05 and odds ratio (OR) from 0.45 to 7.46; P < 0.05]. These findings suggest that a deep bite, in particular with retroclined upper incisors, can represent a risk factor for TMD.

摘要

对成年深覆合患者的颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)和心理状态进行了检查,并与年龄和性别匹配的中性咬合成年对照组进行比较。深覆合组由20名女性(平均年龄30.3岁)和10名男性(平均年龄33.1岁)组成。对照组包括20名女性(平均年龄29.4岁)和10名男性(平均年龄34.2岁)。根据颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)进行TMD检查,拍摄头颅侧位X线片,记录咬合情况,并测量咬合力。为检验两组在颅面形态、咬合力、RDC/TMD诊断组的发生率以及头痛方面的均值差异,进行了独立样本t检验、Fisher精确检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和多元逻辑回归分析。与对照组相比,深覆合患者更频繁地报告夜间和日间紧咬牙(P < 0.01)、咬合不适(P < 0.001)、下颌僵硬(P < 0.05)和耳鸣(P < 0.001)。与对照组相比,深覆合组头痛(P < 0.001)、肌肉紊乱(P < 0.001)、盘移位(P < 0.05)和其他关节紊乱(P < 0.05)的发生率明显更高。与对照组相比,深覆合组的躯体化评分显著更高(P < 0.001)。头痛、肌肉紊乱、盘移位和其他关节紊乱与一些颅面维度和心理因素显著相关[相关系数(R)在0.32至0.72之间;P < 0.05,优势比(OR)在0.45至7.46之间;P < 0.05]。这些发现表明,深覆合,尤其是上切牙舌倾的深覆合,可能是TMD的一个危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验