Rossney Angela S, Herra Celine M, Brennan Gráinne I, Morgan Pamela M, O'Connell Brian
National MRSA Reference Laboratory, St. James's Hospital, James's St., Dublin 8, Ireland.
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Oct;46(10):3285-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02487-07. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
The need for rapid methods to accurately detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is widely acknowledged, and a number of molecular assays are commercially available. This study evaluated the Xpert MRSA assay, which is run on the GeneXpert real-time PCR platform (Cepheid) for use in a clinical laboratory. The following parameters were investigated: (i) the limits of detection (LoDs) for four MRSA strains; (ii) the ability to detect isolates of MRSA from a collection representative of MRSA in Ireland since 1974 (n = 114) and the ability to detect control strains with staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types IVa (IV.1.1.1), IVb (IV.2.1.1), IVc (IV.3.1.1), IVd (IV.4.1.1), V (V.1.1.1), V(T), and VI; and (iii) performance in a clinical trial with swabs from nose, throat, and groin/perineum sites from 204 patients, where results were compared with those obtained by direct and enrichment cultures. The average LoD of the four test strains was 610 CFU/ml (equivalent to 58 CFU/swab). All 114 MRSA isolates and 7 control strains tested were detected. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for clinical specimens from all sites investigated were 90%, 97%, 86%, and 98%, respectively, but throat specimens yielded poor sensitivity (75%). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for nasal specimens were 95%, 98%, 90%, and 99%, respectively. Overall, the assay was rapid and easy to perform, but performance might be enhanced by the inclusion of an equivocal interpretive category based on analysis of all available amplification data.
快速准确检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的方法的需求已得到广泛认可,并且有多种分子检测方法可供商业使用。本研究评估了在GeneXpert实时PCR平台(赛沛公司)上运行的Xpert MRSA检测方法,以用于临床实验室。研究了以下参数:(i)四种MRSA菌株的检测限(LoD);(ii)从1974年以来爱尔兰具有代表性的MRSA菌株集合中检测MRSA分离株的能力(n = 114)以及检测具有葡萄球菌盒式染色体mec类型IVa(IV.1.1.1)、IVb(IV.2.1.1)、IVc(IV.3.1.1)、IVd(IV.4.1.1)、V(V.1.1.1)、V(T)和VI的对照菌株的能力;(iii)在一项临床试验中的性能,该试验使用了来自204名患者的鼻、咽和腹股沟/会阴部位的拭子,将结果与直接培养和富集培养获得的结果进行比较。四种测试菌株的平均检测限为610 CFU/ml(相当于58 CFU/拭子)。所检测的114株MRSA分离株和7株对照菌株均被检测到。所有研究部位的临床标本的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为90%、97%、86%和98%,但咽拭子标本的敏感性较差(75%)。鼻拭子标本的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为95%、98%、90%和99%。总体而言,该检测方法快速且易于操作,但基于对所有可用扩增数据的分析纳入一个模棱两可的解释类别可能会提高其性能。