Suppr超能文献

原发性慢性硬膜下血肿的管理:英国和爱尔兰共和国的实践问卷调查

The management of primary chronic subdural haematoma: a questionnaire survey of practice in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.

作者信息

Santarius T, Lawton R, Kirkpatrick P J, Hutchinson P J

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;22(4):529-34. doi: 10.1080/02688690802195381.

Abstract

A wide range of treatment modalities are employed in the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). A rational and evidence-based treatment strategy has the potential to optimise treatment for the individual patient and save resources. The aim of this study was to survey aspects of current practice in the UK and Ireland. A 1-page postal questionnaire addressing the treatment of primary (i.e. not recurrent) CSDH was sent to consultant SBNS members in March 2006. There were 112 responses from 215 questionnaires (52%). The preferred surgical technique was burr hole drainage (92%). Most surgeons prefer not to place a drain, with 27% never using one and 58% using drain only in one-quarter of cases or less. Only 11% of surgeons always place a drain, and only 30% place one in 75% of cases or more. The closed subdural-to-external drainage was most commonly used (91%) with closed subgaleal-to-external and subdural-to-peritoneal conduit used less often (3 and 4%, respectively). Only 5% of responders claimed to know the exact recurrence rate. The average perceived recurrence rate among the surgeons that never use drains and those who always use drains, was the same (both 11%). Most operations are performed by registrars (77%). Postoperative imaging is requested routinely by 32% of respondents and 57% of surgeons prescribe bed rest. Ninety four per cent surgeons employ conservative management in less than one-quarter of cases. Forty-two per cent of surgeons never prescribe steroids, 55% prescribe them to those managed conservatively. This survey demonstrates that there are diverse practices in the management of CSDH. This may be because of sufficiently persuasive evidence either does not exist or is not always taken into account. The current literature provides Class II and III evidence and there is a need for randomized studies to address the role of external drainage, steroids and postoperative bed rest.

摘要

慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)的治疗采用了多种治疗方式。合理且基于证据的治疗策略有可能为个体患者优化治疗并节省资源。本研究的目的是调查英国和爱尔兰当前的治疗实践情况。2006年3月,向神经外科专科医生协会(SBNS)成员发送了一份关于原发性(即非复发性)CSDH治疗的1页邮政问卷。215份问卷中有112份回复(52%)。首选的手术技术是钻孔引流(92%)。大多数外科医生不倾向于放置引流管,27%的医生从不使用引流管,58%的医生仅在四分之一或更少的病例中使用引流管。只有11%的外科医生总是放置引流管,只有30%的医生在75%或更多的病例中放置引流管。闭合性硬膜下 - 外引流最常用(91%),闭合性帽状腱膜下 - 外引流和硬膜下 - 腹腔引流管使用较少(分别为3%和4%)。只有5%的受访者声称知道确切的复发率。从不使用引流管的外科医生和总是使用引流管的外科医生中,平均感知复发率相同(均为11%)。大多数手术由住院医生进行(77%)。32%的受访者常规要求术后影像学检查,57%的外科医生规定患者卧床休息。94%的外科医生在不到四分之一的病例中采用保守治疗。42%的外科医生从不开类固醇药物,55%的医生给采用保守治疗的患者开类固醇药物。这项调查表明,CSDH的管理存在多种做法。这可能是因为不存在足够有说服力的证据,或者这些证据并未总是被考虑在内。当前的文献提供了II类和III类证据,需要进行随机研究以探讨外引流、类固醇药物和术后卧床休息的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验