Gazzeri Roberto, Laszlo Adrienn, Faiola Andrea, Colangeli Mario, Comberiati Antonio, Bolognini Andrea, Callovini Giorgio
Department of Neurosurgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Regina Elena" - IFO, Rome, Italy.
Department of Neurosurgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;191:105705. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105705. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common diseases in the routine neurosurgical practice. The most usual procedures for CSDH treatment include single or multiple burr hole drainage craniectomy. There is still controversy, however, about the risks and benefits of the different surgical approaches and types of drainage. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the postoperative complications of the various surgical techniques of CSDH.
We conducted a single center retrospective analysis on 414 patients surgically treated for CSDH over a period of 6 years. Comparisons were made after dividing the patients into 4 groups based on the surgical technique and type of drainage: Single burr hole with subdural drainage (Group Ia), single burr hole with subgaleal drainage (Group Ib), craniotomy with subdural drainage (Group IIa), and craniotomy with subgaleal drainage (Group IIb). 238 cases underwent burr hole with irrigation, while 290 cases were treated with craniotomy. Of the analysed patients, subdural drainage was inserted in 382 cases, while subgaleal drain was used only in 146 patients, for a total of 528 procedures.
Re-operation was performed in 9.47 % of cases. The frequency of re-intervention for recurrences appeared to be lower in the Group I a (5.06 %), while the frequency of the re-intervention was higher in the craniotomy with subdural drainage group (Group IIa, 11.6 %). 14 patients (2.65 %) developed acute subdural rebleeding in the immediate postoperative period with 6 of them on antiplatelets/anticoagulants in the preoperative period.
Recurrence rate and functional outcome after surgical drainage of CSDH does not appear to be affected by surgical technique (craniotomy vs burrhole) and drainage location. To our opinion, surgeons may elect procedures on a case-by-case basis.
慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是神经外科常规诊疗中最常见的疾病之一。CSDH治疗最常用的手术方法包括单孔或多孔钻孔引流术及颅骨切除术。然而,不同手术方式和引流类型的风险与益处仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估CSDH各种手术技术的术后并发症。
我们对6年间接受CSDH手术治疗的414例患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。根据手术技术和引流类型将患者分为4组进行比较:单孔硬膜下引流(Ia组)、单孔帽状腱膜下引流(Ib组)、开颅硬膜下引流(IIa组)和开颅帽状腱膜下引流(IIb组)。238例患者接受钻孔冲洗,290例患者接受开颅手术。在分析的患者中,382例插入硬膜下引流,仅146例使用帽状腱膜下引流,共进行了528例手术。
9.47%的病例进行了再次手术。Ia组复发再次干预的频率似乎较低(5.06%),而开颅硬膜下引流组(IIa组)再次干预的频率较高(11.6%)。14例患者(2.65%)在术后即刻发生急性硬膜下再出血,其中6例在术前使用抗血小板/抗凝药物。
CSDH手术引流后的复发率和功能结局似乎不受手术技术(开颅术与钻孔术)和引流部位的影响。我们认为,外科医生可根据具体情况选择手术方式。