Hall Mary Ann Kirkconnell, Stephenson Rob B, Juvekar Sanjay
Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2008 Jun;26(2):241-50.
Women in a small coastal village in western India were asked to explain their preference for female sterilization over modern reversible contraceptive methods. Married women aged 19+ years were interviewed in six focus groups (n=60) and individually (n=15) regarding contraceptive methods and their use and side-effects. Women publicly denied contraceptive use but privately acknowledged limited use. They obtained contraceptive information from other village women and believed that modem reversible methods and vasectomy have high physical and social risks, and fertility goals could be achieved without their use. Women felt that reversible contraception is undesirable, socially unacceptable, and usually unnecessary, although the achievement of fertility goals is likely due to the use of female sterilization with abortion as a back-up method. Economic migration of village men may also play a role. Although women with high social capital can effectively disseminate correct knowledge, the impact on the uptake of reversible method is uncertain.
印度西部一个沿海小村庄的女性被要求解释她们为何更倾向于女性绝育而非现代可逆避孕方法。研究人员对19岁及以上的已婚女性进行了访谈,其中60人参与了六个焦点小组访谈,15人接受了单独访谈,内容涉及避孕方法及其使用情况和副作用。这些女性在公开场合否认使用过避孕措施,但私下承认有过有限的使用。她们从村里的其他女性那里获取避孕信息,并认为现代可逆避孕方法和输精管切除术存在较高的身体和社会风险,不使用这些方法也能实现生育目标。女性觉得可逆避孕不受欢迎、在社会上不可接受且通常没有必要,尽管通过女性绝育并以堕胎作为备用方法可能实现生育目标。村里男性的经济移民也可能起到了一定作用。尽管具有高社会资本的女性能够有效地传播正确知识,但对可逆避孕方法采用率的影响尚不确定。