Subbiah M T Ravi
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, USA.
OMICS. 2008 Dec;12(4):229-35. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0033.
The marked differences in individual response to dietary factors have led to major controversies in nutrition and puzzled nutrition scientists over the last century. The emerging field of nutrigenomics helps us to understand the basis for some of these differences and also promises us the ability to tailor diet based on individual genetic makeup. Great advances in Human Genome Project, documentation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes and their association with metabolic imbalances have gradually added new tests to the nutrigenomic panel. Studies based on ethnopharmacology and phytotherapy concepts showed that nutrients and botanicals can interact with the genome causing marked changes in gene expression. This has led to the commercial development of nutraceuticals and functional foods that can modify negative health effects of individual genetic profile bringing the field to the "food/genome" junction. Despite the promise of nutrigenomics to personalize diet, there is skepticism whether it can truly bring about meaningful modification of the risk factors connected to chronic diseases, due to the lack of large scale nutrition intervention studies. Several intervention studies currently underway in the United States and abroad (Israel, Spain, and France) will further help validate nutrigenomic concepts. France has already introduced a National Nutrition and Health Program to assess nutritional status and risk of major metabolic diseases. As the field(s) related to nutritional genomics advance in their scope, it is essential that: (a) strict guidelines be followed in the nomenclature and definition of the subdisciplines; and (b) the state/federal regulatory guidelines be updated for diagnostic laboratories, especially for those offering tests directly to the public (without a physician's request) to help protect the consumer.
个体对饮食因素的反应存在显著差异,这在过去一个世纪引发了营养学界的重大争议,并使营养科学家们感到困惑。营养基因组学这一新兴领域有助于我们理解其中一些差异的根源,还让我们有望根据个体基因构成来定制饮食。人类基因组计划取得了巨大进展,对候选基因中单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的记录及其与代谢失衡的关联,逐渐为营养基因组检测项目增添了新的检测方法。基于民族药理学和植物疗法概念的研究表明,营养素和植物药可与基因组相互作用,导致基因表达发生显著变化。这推动了营养保健品和功能性食品的商业开发,这些产品能够改变个体基因特征对健康的负面影响,从而使该领域进入了“食物/基因组”交叉点。尽管营养基因组学有望实现个性化饮食,但由于缺乏大规模营养干预研究,人们对它能否真正有效改变与慢性病相关的风险因素仍持怀疑态度。目前美国及国外(以色列、西班牙和法国)正在进行的几项干预研究将进一步有助于验证营养基因组学概念。法国已经推出了一项国家营养与健康计划,以评估营养状况和主要代谢疾病的风险。随着与营养基因组学相关领域的范围不断扩大,至关重要的是:(a)在各子学科的命名和定义方面遵循严格的指导原则;(b)针对诊断实验室,尤其是那些直接向公众提供检测服务(无需医生要求)的实验室,更新州/联邦监管指南,以帮助保护消费者。