Xu Ji-yuan, Li Mao-qin, Zhang Zhou, Lu Fei, Li Lin, Li Jia-qiong, Mo Xun, Xu Yan-jun, Liu Jun, Dai Ti-jun
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Central Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou 221009, Jiangsu, China.
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Aug;20(8):449-51.
To observe the effects of sedation with midazolam and propofol on anterograde amnesia in critical patients.
Sixty selected patients on mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) were randomly divided into three subgroups (propofol, midazolam, and midazolam and propofol combination group), with 20 cases in each group. Patients who were awakened from sedation were showed with a card depicted with different colors, figures and numbers. When patients were totally conscious after weaning from mechanical ventilation,the influence of the different methods of sedation on anterograde amnesia of these critically ill patients was assessed.
(1) 70%, 95% and 90% of patients manifested amnesia in propofol, midazolam and the combination group, respectively. All the patients recovered their memory immediately in 30 minutes after withdrawal of the sedatives. (2) When midazolam was compared with propofol and combination group, time of onset was obviously prolonged after an intravenous injection of a load dose in midazolam group [(2.7+/-1.1) minutes and (3.1+/-1.3) minutes vs. (5.1+/-2.8) minutes], also was time of extubation after regaining of consciousness [(0.7+/-0.2) hour and (1.2+/-0.6) hours vs. (2.7+/-0.3) hours, all P<0.01]. There was no significant difference between propofol group and the combination group in time of onset and extubation (both P>0.05). (3) Cost of propofol [(2,100+/-125) yuan] was 75% higher than that of midazolam [(1,200+/-112) yuan, P<0.01], but cost of sedatives in the combination group [(1,300+/-132) yuan] was similar to that in midazolam group (P>0.05).
Combination of midazolam and propofol can not only ensure anterograde amnesia in critical patients, reduce drug dosage and adverse reactions, but also can help reduce the hospital expenses. This method may be a better sedation program in ICU.
观察咪达唑仑和丙泊酚镇静对重症患者顺行性遗忘的影响。
选取重症监护病房(ICU)中60例接受机械通气的患者,随机分为三个亚组(丙泊酚组、咪达唑仑组和咪达唑仑与丙泊酚联合组),每组20例。对从镇静中唤醒的患者展示一张绘有不同颜色、图形和数字的卡片。当患者机械通气撤机后完全清醒时,评估不同镇静方法对这些重症患者顺行性遗忘的影响。
(1)丙泊酚组、咪达唑仑组和联合组分别有70%、95%和90%的患者出现遗忘。所有患者在停用镇静剂后30分钟内立即恢复记忆。(2)与丙泊酚组和联合组相比,咪达唑仑组静脉注射负荷剂量后起效时间明显延长[(2.7±1.1)分钟和(3.1±1.3)分钟对(5.1±2.8)分钟],意识恢复后拔管时间也延长[(0.7±0.2)小时和(1.2±0.6)小时对(2.7±0.3)小时,均P<0.01]。丙泊酚组和联合组在起效时间和拔管时间上无显著差异(均P>0.05)。(3)丙泊酚费用[(2100±125)元]比咪达唑仑费用[(1200±112)元]高75%(P<0.01),但联合组镇静剂费用[(1300±132)元]与咪达唑仑组相似(P>0.05)。
咪达唑仑与丙泊酚联合应用不仅可确保重症患者顺行性遗忘,减少药物用量和不良反应,还可有助于降低住院费用。该方法可能是ICU中较好的镇静方案。