• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期经皮介入治疗可提高合并心源性休克的老年急性心肌梗死患者的生存率。

Early percutaneous intervention improves survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

作者信息

Guo Liang, Mai Xiaoyan, Deng Jie, Liu Anheng, Bu Lun, Wang Haichang

机构信息

Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, China.

出版信息

Kardiol Pol. 2008 Jul;66(7):722-6; discussion 727-8.

PMID:18690563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safety and effectiveness of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) are currently unknown.

AIM

To compare the outcome of elderly patients with AMI complicated by CS who were treated with primary PCI or thrombolysis.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2006 at Xijing Hospital we evaluated the outcome of 94 patients ł75 years old with AMI complicated by CS, of whom 33 underwent emergency PCI (PCI group), whereas the other 61 received initially conventional medication (CM group).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, infarct location, rate of intra-aortic balloon pump support and time from AMI onset to therapy were similar between the two groups. The success rate of revascularisation in the PCI group was 90.9% and the success rate of thrombolysis in the CM group was 60.7% (p=0.004). The PCI group had a lower in-hospital mortality than the CM group (42.4 vs. 65.6%, p=0.026). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference in survival (48.48 vs. 21.31%, p=0.006), favouring early PCI. Multiple logistic regression identified time from AMI onset to therapy as an independent predictor of in-hospital death (p=0.036). Cox regression analysis indicated early PCI as an independent factor to improve mid-term survival (p=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency PCI improves 1-year survival compared with initial conventional medication for elderly patients with AMI complicated by CS.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并心源性休克(CS)患者中的安全性和有效性。

目的

比较接受直接PCI或溶栓治疗的老年AMI合并CS患者的治疗结果。

方法

2001年至2006年期间,我们在西京医院评估了94例年龄≥75岁的AMI合并CS患者的治疗结果,其中33例接受了急诊PCI(PCI组),而另外61例最初接受了传统药物治疗(CM组)。

结果

两组患者的基线特征、梗死部位、主动脉内球囊泵支持率以及从AMI发作到治疗的时间相似。PCI组的血管再通成功率为90.9%,CM组的溶栓成功率为60.7%(p=0.004)。PCI组的院内死亡率低于CM组(42.4%对65.6%,p=0.026)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示生存率存在显著差异(48.48%对21.31%,p=0.006),支持早期PCI。多因素logistic回归分析确定从AMI发作到治疗的时间是院内死亡的独立预测因素(p=0.036)。Cox回归分析表明早期PCI是改善中期生存的独立因素(p=0.015)。

结论

对于老年AMI合并CS患者,与初始传统药物治疗相比,急诊PCI可提高1年生存率。

相似文献

1
Early percutaneous intervention improves survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.早期经皮介入治疗可提高合并心源性休克的老年急性心肌梗死患者的生存率。
Kardiol Pol. 2008 Jul;66(7):722-6; discussion 727-8.
2
Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克管理中的实践模式变化:老年患者与年轻患者的比较
Can J Cardiol. 1998 Jul;14(7):923-30.
3
Routine percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.老年心源性休克合并急性心肌梗死患者的常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Am Heart J. 2006 Nov;152(5):903-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.030.
4
Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.比较急性心肌梗死后并发心原性休克患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前后行主动脉内球囊反搏术的院内死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 1;105(7):967-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.021. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
5
[Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].[主动脉反搏治疗心源性休克患者的短期和中期临床结局]
G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Dec;26(12):1385-99.
6
Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).1333例急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时院内死亡的预测因素;德国心脏病学会(ALKK)直接PCI注册研究结果
Eur Heart J. 2004 Feb;25(4):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.12.008.
7
Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克时的早期血运重建。SHOCK研究组。对于心源性休克,我们是否应紧急对闭塞冠状动脉进行血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901.
8
[Observation of short- and mid-term clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with heart failure or cardiogenic shock].[急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭或心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期和中期临床结局观察]
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2005 Aug;25(8):1064-6.
9
Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.心源性休克患者在溶栓治疗失败后是否应接受补救性血管成形术:心源性休克患者直接血管成形术与补救性血管成形术的比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 May;19(5):217-23.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: immediate and late outcomes.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:近期和远期疗效
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Oct;84(10):1449-54.