Suppr超能文献

哮喘不及格?当医疗效果数据信息集(HEDIS)进行质量评估时。

Flunking asthma? When HEDIS takes the ACT.

作者信息

Lim Kaiser G, Patel Ashok M, Naessens James M, Li James T, Volcheck Gerald W, Wagie Amy E, Enders Felicity B, Beebe Timothy J

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E18), Mayo Clinic, Bldg E 18, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2008 Aug;14(8):487-94.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test several patient-oriented asthma outcome measures and the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measure of appropriate medication for persistent asthma to determine the most useful quality indicator of asthma care.

DESIGN

Prospective mail survey of adult employees and dependents with asthma.

METHODS

The medical and pharmacy claims of all subjects from 12 months before and after the survey were abstracted. Outcomes measures included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), workday loss, unscheduled healthcare utilization (emergency department and inpatient care), and satisfaction with care.

RESULTS

Although 81% of all responders had wellcontrolled asthma, persistent asthma was uncontrolled in 28%. Only 64.5% received appropriate controller medication. Well-controlled asthma is associated with a high degree of satisfaction, less workday loss, fewer prednisone bursts, and minimal unscheduled healthcare utilization. Except for a reduced incidence of more than 2 oral corticosteroid dispensings (6.4% vs 13.6%, P = .012), compliance with the HEDIS appropriate medication for asthma was not positively associated with any of the patient-centered outcomes studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma control was the most useful patient outcome quality indicator in this study. Compliance with the HEDIS asthma measure in this population was not associated with a better patient-oriented outcome. This finding may be different with different levels of asthma control. The positive association between well-controlled asthma and patient satisfaction, minimal unscheduled healthcare utilization, and low workday loss suggests that asthma control as measured by ACT may be a better performance measure in asthma.

摘要

目的

测试几种以患者为导向的哮喘结局指标以及持续性哮喘适当药物治疗的医疗保健有效性数据与信息集(HEDIS)指标,以确定哮喘护理中最有用的质量指标。

设计

对成年哮喘员工及其家属进行前瞻性邮件调查。

方法

提取调查前后12个月内所有受试者的医疗和药房理赔数据。结局指标包括哮喘控制测试(ACT)、工作日损失、非计划医疗保健利用(急诊科和住院治疗)以及护理满意度。

结果

尽管81%的所有应答者哮喘得到良好控制,但28%的持续性哮喘未得到控制。只有64.5%的患者接受了适当的控制药物治疗。哮喘得到良好控制与高度满意度、较少的工作日损失、较少的泼尼松突击治疗以及最低限度的非计划医疗保健利用相关。除了超过2次口服糖皮质激素配药的发生率降低外(6.4%对13.6%,P = 0.012),符合HEDIS哮喘适当药物治疗与所研究的任何以患者为中心的结局均无正相关。

结论

在本研究中,哮喘控制是最有用的患者结局质量指标。该人群中符合HEDIS哮喘指标与更好的以患者为导向的结局无关。不同哮喘控制水平下这一发现可能有所不同。哮喘得到良好控制与患者满意度、最低限度的非计划医疗保健利用以及低工作日损失之间的正相关表明,通过ACT测量的哮喘控制可能是哮喘中更好的绩效指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验