• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A single-center experience of the usefulness of caliceal-pelvic height in three different lithotripters.

作者信息

Ng C F, Wong Annie, Tolley D A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1409-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0448.

DOI:10.1089/end.2006.0448
PMID:18690807
Abstract

PURPOSE

Stone-free rates for lower caliceal stones after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) are persistently poor. As stone-free rates vary with lithotripter type, we have compared the applicability of caliceal-pelvic height (CPH) in the prediction of stone clearance in patients treated with three different lithotripters within one center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred seventy adult patients with solitary, radiopaque, lower caliceal stones of size 6 to 10 mm receiving primary SWL between January 1992 and June 2002 were identified. They were treated with one of three lithotriptors: the Wolf Piezolith 2300, the Dornier MPL 9000, and the Dornier Compact Delta. Pretreatment intravenous urograms were reviewed and CPH, the vertical distance from the lowermost point of the calix to the highest point of the lower lip of pelvis, was measured. The primary end-point was stone-free status after 3 months. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of different potential predictor variables for the overall results and individual machines were estimated using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

In the overall analysis, stone size and machine type were the only predictors associated with stone clearance. While smaller stones had better clearance overall, the MPL 9000 appears to have the best performance, followed by the Piezolith 2300. However, after patients were stratified into different machine subgroups, CPH became a significant predictor of stone-free rate for the Piezolith 2300 (AOR = 0.960; 95% CI 0.925, 0.960; P = 0.031), but not the other two machines.

CONCLUSIONS

CPH was only useful in the prediction of lower caliceal stone clearance for the Piezolith 2300. Therefore the usefulness of one anatomic factor to assess treatment using one lithotripter may not be extrapolated to other machines.

摘要

相似文献

1
A single-center experience of the usefulness of caliceal-pelvic height in three different lithotripters.
J Endourol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1409-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0448.
2
Single-center experience using three shockwave lithotripters with different generator designs in management of urinary calculi.单中心使用三种具有不同发生器设计的冲击波碎石机治疗尿路结石的经验。
J Endourol. 2006 Jan;20(1):1-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.1.
3
Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle?与测量肾盂漏斗部角度相比,是否存在更简单的方法来预测冲击波碎石术后下极结石的清除情况?
J Endourol. 2000 Aug;14(6):475-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2000.14.475.
4
[Usefulness of lower ihfundibular length-to-diameter ratio as a predictor of lower pole stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; clinical research with two lithotriptors].[较低的肾盂漏斗部长度与直径比值作为体外冲击波碎石术后下极结石清除预测指标的有效性;两种碎石机的临床研究]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2003 Sep;94(6):608-13. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.94.608.
5
Is stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in patients with solitary upper-caliceal stone influenced by anatomic differences in the pelvicaliceal system?孤立性上肾盏结石患者冲击波碎石术后的结石清除情况是否受肾盂肾盏系统解剖差异的影响?
J Endourol. 2007 Jan;21(1):18-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0156.
6
Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones.评估下极肾盏主要空间解剖学因素之间的关系对下极肾结石患者冲击波碎石术成功率的影响。
Urology. 2008 May;71(5):801-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.052. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
7
Radiographic anatomical factors do not predict clearance of lower caliceal calculus by shock-wave lithotripsy.影像学解剖因素无法预测冲击波碎石术治疗下盏结石的结石清除情况。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(3):226-9. doi: 10.1080/00365590510007748.
8
Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices.冲击波碎石术治疗肾上、中、下盏肾结石的对比结果。
J Endourol. 2007 Sep;21(9):951-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0275.
9
Lower-caliceal stone clearance index to predict clearance of stone after SWL.
J Endourol. 2006 Apr;20(4):248-51. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.248.
10
Does lower-pole caliceal anatomy predict stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for primary lower-pole nephrolithiasis?下极肾盏解剖结构能否预测原发性下极肾结石冲击波碎石术后的结石清除情况?
Urol Int. 2007;79(2):129-32. doi: 10.1159/000106325.

引用本文的文献

1
How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?我们应如何以及应该如何优化体外冲击波碎石术?
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
2
Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.关于如何进行体外冲击波碎石术以达到最大效果的各个方面。
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):433-46. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0485-z. Epub 2012 Jun 27.