Lenhard G, Kieferndorf U, Berner G, Vögtle-Junkert U, Wagener H H
Institut für Klinische Forschung, Hagenbitze, Overath, Germany.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1991 Jun;29(6):231-7.
In a within-subject comparative trial in 16 healthy volunteers, the bioequivalence of two sulpiride 200 mg preparations was tested using a model-free method of calculation as well as assuming 2- and 3-compartment models. As to AUC act., AUC inf. and Cmax, the test preparation was shown to be significantly superior. Some other differences were found depending on which calculation method was used. The Cmax of the test preparation showed therapeutically relevant plasma concentrations of greater than 400 ng/ml, compared with about 300 ng/ml for the reference preparation. Based upon the raw data obtained, it was the aim of this study to gain further knowledge about other kinetic parameters on which only few data is available. T1/2 beta, clearance, volume of distribution and MRT were calculated using 2- and 3-compartment models. Comparisons with literature data were made and it resulted that a better description of the sulpiride kinetics was obtained when a 3-compartment model was used. Finally, the course of the plasma level was calculated by computer extrapolation assuming a thrice daily administration of sulpiride 200 mg. As a result, steady-state is reached after 3-4 days showing plasma concentrations around 650 ng (reference preparation) and 850 ng (test preparation).
在一项针对16名健康志愿者的受试者内比较试验中,使用无模型计算方法以及假设二室和三室模型,对两种200毫克舒必利制剂的生物等效性进行了测试。关于AUCact.、AUCinf.和Cmax,受试制剂显示出显著优越性。根据所使用的计算方法还发现了其他一些差异。受试制剂的Cmax显示出治疗相关的血浆浓度大于400纳克/毫升,而参比制剂约为300纳克/毫升。基于所获得的原始数据,本研究的目的是进一步了解其他仅有少量数据的动力学参数。使用二室和三室模型计算了T1/2β、清除率、分布容积和平均驻留时间。与文献数据进行了比较,结果表明,使用三室模型时对舒必利动力学的描述更好。最后,假设每日三次服用200毫克舒必利,通过计算机外推法计算血浆水平的变化过程。结果,在3 - 4天后达到稳态,显示血浆浓度约为650纳克(参比制剂)和850纳克(受试制剂)。