Guttenplan M D, Tom L W, DeVito M A, Handler S D, Wetmore R F, Potsic W P
Division of Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1991 May;21(3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(91)90002-s.
Pressure equalization tubes are a well-recognized treatment for persistent otitis media with effusion and recurrent acute otitis media. Ideally, the tube should remain in place until the Eustachian tube function returns. Efforts to improve the functional life expectancy of tubes have concentrated on tube design with little attention directed at modification of the surgical technique. Some authors have noted that a radial incision offers theoretical advantages over a circumferential incision. A randomized study comparing radial and circumferential incisions in myringotomy with tube placement was conducted. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients had a circumferential incision performed in one ear and a radial incision in the opposite ear. On follow-up examinations the tube position and time to extrusion were noted. Using the sign test, there was no statistical difference in extrusion rates between the two groups. This study does not support the theoretical advantages espoused in the literature.
鼓膜通气管是治疗持续性分泌性中耳炎和复发性急性中耳炎的一种公认的方法。理想情况下,通气管应保留在位,直到咽鼓管功能恢复。提高通气管功能寿命的努力主要集中在通气管设计上,而很少关注手术技术的改进。一些作者指出,放射状切口在理论上比环形切口更具优势。我们进行了一项随机研究,比较鼓膜切开置管时放射状切口和环形切口的效果。228例患者一侧耳朵行环形切口,另一侧耳朵行放射状切口。在随访检查中,记录通气管位置和排出时间。采用符号检验,两组通气管排出率无统计学差异。本研究不支持文献中所支持的理论优势。