• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone utilization from January 2007 through May 2008 associated with five risk-warning events.2007年1月至2008年5月期间罗格列酮和吡格列酮的使用与五项风险警示事件相关。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(6):523-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.6.523.
2
Utilization and costs for compliant patients initiating therapy with pioglitazone or rosiglitazone versus insulin in a Medicaid fee-for-service population.在医疗补助按服务收费人群中,使用吡格列酮或罗格列酮起始治疗的依从性患者与使用胰岛素的患者的药物利用情况及成本比较
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Mar;12(2):121-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.2.121.
3
The thiazolidinediones rosiglitazone and pioglitazone and the risk of coronary heart disease: a retrospective cohort study using a US health insurance database.噻唑烷二酮类药物罗格列酮和吡格列酮与冠心病风险:一项使用美国医疗保险数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2665-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.003.
4
Implications of Removing Rosiglitazone's Black Box Warning and Restricted Access Program on the Uptake of Thiazolidinediones and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.取消罗格列酮的黑框警告和限制获取程序对 2 型糖尿病患者使用噻唑烷二酮类药物和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):72-79. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.072.
5
Incidence of cardiovascular events in which 2 thiazolidinediones are used as add-on treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Taiwanese population.在台湾人群中,2 种噻唑烷二酮类药物作为 2 型糖尿病的附加治疗药物,其心血管事件的发生率。
Clin Ther. 2011 Dec;33(12):1904-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.10.025. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
6
Utilisation trends of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in Australia before and after safety warnings.罗格列酮和吡格列酮在澳大利亚发布安全警告前后的使用趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 4;14:151. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-151.
7
Use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone immediately after the cardiovascular risk warnings.在心血管风险警告发布后立即使用罗格列酮和吡格列酮。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Jan-Feb;8(1):47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
8
Antidiabetic prescribing trends and predictors of thiazolidinedione discontinuation following the 2007 rosiglitazone safety alert.2007 年罗格列酮安全性警示后噻唑烷二酮类药物停药的抗糖尿病药物处方趋势和预测因素。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;93(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.035. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
9
Rosiglitazone prior authorization safety policy: a cohort study.罗格列酮预先授权安全政策:一项队列研究。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Apr;18(3):225-33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.3.225.
10
Thiazolidinediones, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular mortality: translating research into action for diabetes (TRIAD).噻唑烷二酮类药物、心血管疾病和心血管死亡率:将研究转化为糖尿病行动(TRIAD)。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jul;19(7):715-21. doi: 10.1002/pds.1954.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Elderly Patients with Frailty and/or Sarcopenia.老年衰弱和/或肌少症患者 2 型糖尿病的管理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;19(14):8677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148677.
2
Endothelial Cell-Targeted Deletion of PPAR Blocks Rosiglitazone-Induced Plasma Volume Expansion and Vascular Remodeling in Adipose Tissue.内皮细胞靶向敲除 PPAR 阻断罗格列酮诱导的脂肪组织血浆容量扩张和血管重塑。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019 Mar;368(3):514-523. doi: 10.1124/jpet.118.250985. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
3
Implications of Removing Rosiglitazone's Black Box Warning and Restricted Access Program on the Uptake of Thiazolidinediones and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.取消罗格列酮的黑框警告和限制获取程序对 2 型糖尿病患者使用噻唑烷二酮类药物和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):72-79. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.072.
4
Lifestyle Approaches and Glucose Intolerance.生活方式干预与葡萄糖不耐受
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Jun 23;10(6):406-416. doi: 10.1177/1559827614554186. eCollection 2016 Nov-Dec.
5
Diagnoses of Cardiovascular Disease or Substance Addiction/Abuse in US Adults Treated for ADHD with Stimulants or Atomoxetine: Is Use Consistent with Product Labeling?在美国接受兴奋剂或托莫西汀治疗多动症的成年人中,心血管疾病或物质成瘾/滥用的诊断情况:其使用是否符合产品标签要求?
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018 Mar;5(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s40801-017-0129-2.
6
Measuring the impact of medicines regulatory interventions - Systematic review and methodological considerations.衡量药品监管干预措施的影响——系统评价及方法学考虑。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;84(3):419-433. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13469. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Non-health Care Facility Medication Errors Associated with Hormones and Hormone Antagonists in the United States.美国与激素及激素拮抗剂相关的非医疗机构用药错误
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0630-8. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
8
PPARs and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体与非酒精性脂肪性肝病
Biochimie. 2017 May;136:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
9
Influence of health warnings on the use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in an area of Spain: A time-series study.健康警示对西班牙某地区罗格列酮和吡格列酮使用情况的影响:一项时间序列研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Aug 16;4:2050312116653054. doi: 10.1177/2050312116653054. eCollection 2016.
10
Medication usage, treatment intensification, and medical cost in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective database study.药物使用、治疗强化与 2 型糖尿病患者的医疗费用:一项回顾性数据库研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 Jul 18;4(1):e000189. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000189. eCollection 2016.

2007年1月至2008年5月期间罗格列酮和吡格列酮的使用与五项风险警示事件相关。

Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone utilization from January 2007 through May 2008 associated with five risk-warning events.

作者信息

Starner Catherine I, Schafer Jeremy A, Heaton Alan H, Gleason Patrick P

机构信息

Prime Therapeutics LLC, Eagan, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(6):523-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.6.523.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.6.523
PMID:18693776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438103/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rosiglitazone was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for type 2 diabetes in 1999. The unique mechanism of action and low risk of hypoglycemia contributed to rapid market uptake of rosiglitazone, but safety concerns became more prominent in 2007. There were 5 major events on 4 calendar days in 2007 regarding safety concerns related to rosiglitazone in certain patients: (1) the May 21, 2007, online release of the rosiglitazone meta-analysis performed by Nissen and Wolski and the FDA safety warning on the same day; (2) the July 30, 2007, conclusion of an FDA advisory committee meeting that rosiglitazone increased cardiac ischemic risk; (3) the August 14, 2007, update of thiazolidinedione (TZD) labels with a black-box warning for heart failure; and (4) the November 14, 2007, update to the warnings and precautions section of the rosiglitazone label for coadministration of nitrate or insulin.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) describe TZD (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) utilization trends from January 1, 2007, continuing through May 2008 amid public announcements of safety concerns and (2) determine the percentage of TZD users who had medical claims indicating increased cardiovascular (CV) risk before and after release (May 21, 2007) of the FDA safety warning and online release of the meta-analysis performed by Nissen and Wolski.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims was performed from 9 commercial plans with a combined 9 million eligible members, including a 1.4 million-member cohort from 1 of the plans for which medical claims data were available. We evaluated trends in TZD use for each month for the 17-month period from January 1, 2007, through May 31, 2008, including the percentage of TZD users at increased CV risk. In the trend analysis, for each calendar month of 2007, we calculated mean pharmacy claim counts per day per million members for each of the 2 TZD drugs and for a comparison drug, sitagliptin, a new oral hypoglycemic agent in a different class (dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV inhibitors). For the CV risk analysis, we used the database of integrated medical and pharmacy claims for the 1.4 million-member cohort to identify patients with a current days supply of a TZD on May 20, 2007, December 7, 2007, or May 20, 2008. The medical claims for all identified patients were queried back 2 years from May 20, 2007, December 7, 2007, or May 20, 2008, respectively. Rosiglitazone users at increased CV rsk were defined as those with a medical claim with a primary diagnosis for congestive heart failure (CHF; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes 428.xx or 398.91), those with a current supply of nitrate or insulin therapy, or those with ischemic heart disease, including myocardial infarction (MI; ICD-9-CM codes 410.xx through 414.xx, or surgical procedure codes [36.0x through 36.3x for removal of obstruction and insertion of stents, bypass surgery, and revascularization] in the primary diagnosis field). Pioglitazone users at increased risk were identified from medical claims with a CHF diagnosis code.

RESULTS

The average number of claims per day per million members in January 2007 was 97.3 for rosiglitazone and 107.2 for pioglitazone. The average number of claims for rosiglitazone per day per million members began to decrease in May 2007, falling to 41.0 in December 2007, for a total decrease of 58.6% from the February 2007 peak (99.1), and fell further to 31.8 in May 2008. Pioglitazone use increased 8.0% from January to June 2007 (107.2 to 115.8) and remained relatively flat through December 2007 (114.6) and through May 2008 (108.9). Sitagliptin claims increased 5-fold, at a consistent rate, from an average of 8.6 claims per day per million members in January 2007 to 43.4 in December 2007, and continued to increase to 48.7, in May 2008. Of the 5,117 rosiglitazone users on May 20, 2007, 1,296 (25.3%) were identified at increased CV risk versus 590 (22.5%) of 2,621 users on December 7, 2007 (P = 0.006), and 336 (21.8%) of 1,541 users in May 2008 (P = 0.005). Of 6,056 pioglitazone users on May 20, 2007, 170 (2.8%) had a CHF diagnosis versus 160 (2.5%) of 6,275 users on December 7, 2007 (P = 0.376), and 122 of 5,998 users in May 2008 (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Although rosiglitazone utilization per million members declined by more than half in 2007, when CV safety concerns started to emerge, about 1 in 5 rosiglitazone users had elevated CV risk at year-end 2007 and in May 2008. About 3% of pioglitazone users in May 2007 had a diagnosis of CHF in claims history, which declined to 2% in May 2008. Insurers should consider the impact of persistent utilization of TZDs among members with CV risk factors when making formulary decisions.

摘要

背景

罗格列酮于1999年获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗2型糖尿病。其独特的作用机制和低血糖风险低促使罗格列酮迅速被市场接受,但在2007年安全问题变得更加突出。2007年在4个日历日发生了5起与某些患者使用罗格列酮相关的安全问题重大事件:(1)2007年5月21日,尼森和沃尔斯基进行的罗格列酮荟萃分析在线发布,同日FDA发布安全警告;(2)2007年7月30日,FDA咨询委员会会议得出结论,罗格列酮增加心脏缺血风险;(3)2007年8月14日,噻唑烷二酮(TZD)类药物标签更新,增加心力衰竭黑框警告;(4)2007年11月14日,罗格列酮标签的警告和注意事项部分更新,涉及与硝酸盐或胰岛素合用。

目的

(1)描述2型糖尿病药物(罗格列酮和吡格列酮)在2007年1月1日至2008年5月期间,在安全问题公开宣布情况下的使用趋势;(2)确定在FDA安全警告发布(2007年5月21日)和尼森及沃尔斯基进行的荟萃分析在线发布之前和之后,有医疗索赔表明心血管(CV)风险增加的2型糖尿病药物使用者的百分比。

方法

对9个商业保险计划的药房索赔进行回顾性分析,这些计划共有900万符合条件的成员,其中包括来自其中一个计划的140万成员队列,该队列有可用的医疗索赔数据。我们评估了2007年1月1日至2008年5月31日这17个月期间每月的2型糖尿病药物使用趋势,包括心血管风险增加的2型糖尿病药物使用者的百分比。在趋势分析中,对于2007年的每个日历月,我们计算了两种2型糖尿病药物以及一种对照药物西他列汀(一种不同类别的新型口服降糖药,二肽基肽酶 - IV抑制剂)每百万成员每天的平均药房索赔计数。对于心血管风险分析,我们使用140万成员队列的综合医疗和药房索赔数据库,以识别在2007年5月20日、20077年12月7日或2008年5月20日有当前2型糖尿病药物供应天数的患者。从2007年5月20日、2007年12月7日或2008年5月20日分别回溯查询所有已识别患者的2年医疗索赔。心血管风险增加的罗格列酮使用者定义为那些主要诊断为充血性心力衰竭(CHF;国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本[ICD - 9 - CM]编码428.xx或398.91)的医疗索赔患者、当前正在接受硝酸盐或胰岛素治疗的患者,或患有缺血性心脏病的患者,包括心肌梗死(MI;ICD - 9 - CM编码410.xx至414.xx,或主要诊断字段中的手术操作编码[36.0x至36.3x用于去除梗阻和插入支架、搭桥手术和血管重建])。从有CHF诊断编码的医疗索赔中识别心血管风险增加的吡格列酮使用者。

结果

2007年1月每百万成员每天的索赔平均数,罗格列酮为97.3,吡格列酮为107.2。罗格列酮每百万成员每天的索赔平均数在2007年5月开始下降,2007年12月降至41.0,较2007年2月峰值(99.1)总共下降了58.6%,2008年5月进一步降至31.8。吡格列酮的使用在2007年1月至6月增加了8.0%(从107.2增至115.8),在2007年12月(114.6)和2008年5月(108.9)保持相对稳定。西他列汀的索赔从平均每百万成员每天8.6索赔数,以一致的速率在2007年1月增加到2007年12月的43.4,并在2008年5月继续增加到48.7。在2007年5月20日的5117名罗格列酮使用者中,1296名(25.3%)被确定心血管风险增加,相比之下,在2007年12月7日的2621名使用者中有590名(22.5%)(P = 0.006),在2008年5月的1541名使用者中有336名(21.8%)(P = 0.005)。在2007年5月20日的6056名吡格列酮使用者中,170名(2.8%)有CHF诊断,相比之下,在2007年12月7日的6275名使用者中有160名(2.5%)(P = 0.376),在2008年5月的5998名使用者中有122名(P = 0.006)。

结论

尽管在2007年心血管安全问题开始出现时,每百万成员的罗格列酮使用量下降了一半以上,但在2007年底和2008年5月,约五分之一的罗格列酮使用者心血管风险升高。2007年5月约3%的吡格列酮使用者在索赔历史中有CHF诊断,2008年5月降至2%。保险公司在制定处方决策时应考虑有心血管风险因素的成员持续使用2型糖尿病药物的影响。