Shiu A S, Hogstrom K R
Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Aug;21(3):695-702. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90688-z.
This work has quantitatively studied the variation of dose both within bone and in unit density tissue near bone-tissue interfaces. Dose upstream of a bone-tissue interface is increased because of an increase in the backscattered electrons from the bone. The magnitude of this effect was measured using a thin parallel-plate ionization chamber upstream of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-hard bone interface. The electron backscatter factor (EBF) increased rapidly with bone thickness until a full EBF was achieved. This occurred at approximately 3.5 mm at 2 MeV and 6 mm at 13.1 MeV. The full EBF at the interface ranged from approximately 1.018 at 13.1 MeV to 1.05 at 2 MeV. It was also observed that the EBF had a dependence on the energy spectrum at the interface. The penetration of the backscattered electrons in the upstream direction of PMMA was also measured. The dose penetration fell off rapidly in the upstream direction of the interface. Dose enhancement to unit density tissue in bone was measured for an electron beam by placing thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in a PMMA-bone-PMMA phantom. The maximum dose enhancement in bone was approximately 7% of the maximum dose in water. However, the pencil-beam algorithm of Hogstrom et al. predicted an increase of only 1%, primarily owing to the inverse-square correction. Film was also used to measure the dose enhancement in bone. The film plane was aligned either perpendicular or parallel to the central axis of the beam. The film data indicated that the maximum dose enhancement in bone was approximately 8% for the former film alignment (which was similarly predicted by the TLD measurements) and 13% for the latter film alignment. These results confirm that the X ray film is not suitable to be irritated "edge on" in an inhomogeneous phantom without making perturbation corrections resulting from the film acting as a long narrow inhomogeneous cavity within the bone. In addition, the results give the radiotherapist a basis for clinical judgment when electron beams are used to treat lesions behind bone or near bony structures. We feel these data enhance the ability to recognize the shortcomings of the current dose calculation algorithm used clinically.
