Roy Manojit, Harding Karin, Holt Robert D
Department of Zoology, University of Florida, 223 Bartram Hall, P.O. Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525, USA.
J Theor Biol. 2008 Nov 7;255(1):152-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.022. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
A recent study [Harding and McNamara, 2002. A unifying framework for metapopulation dynamics. Am. Nat. 160, 173-185] presented a unifying framework for the classic Levins metapopulation model by incorporating several realistic biological processes, such as the Allee effect, the Rescue effect and the Anti-rescue effect, via appropriate modifications of the two basic functions of colonization and extinction rates. Here we embed these model extensions on a spatially explicit framework. We consider population dynamics on a regular grid, each site of which represents a patch that is either occupied or empty, and with spatial coupling by neighborhood dispersal. While broad qualitative similarities exist between the spatially explicit models and their spatially implicit (mean-field) counterparts, there are also important differences that result from the details of local processes. Because of localized dispersal, spatial correlation develops among the dynamics of neighboring populations that decays with distance between patches. The extent of this correlation at equilibrium differs among the metapopulation types, depending on which processes prevail in the colonization and extinction dynamics. These differences among dynamical processes become manifest in the spatial pattern and distribution of "clusters" of occupied patches. Moreover, metapopulation dynamics along a smooth gradient of habitat availability show significant differences in the spatial pattern at the range limit. The relevance of these results to the dynamics of disease spread in metapopulations is discussed.
最近的一项研究[哈丁和麦克纳马拉,2002年。集合种群动态的统一框架。《美国博物学家》160卷,第173 - 185页]通过对经典莱文斯集合种群模型的两个基本功能——定殖率和灭绝率进行适当修改,纳入了诸如阿利效应、救援效应和反救援效应等几个现实的生物学过程,从而提出了一个统一框架。在此,我们将这些模型扩展嵌入到一个空间明确的框架中。我们考虑在一个规则网格上的种群动态,网格中的每个位点代表一个斑块,该斑块要么被占据,要么为空,并通过邻域扩散进行空间耦合。虽然空间明确模型与其空间隐含(平均场)对应模型之间存在广泛的定性相似性,但局部过程的细节也导致了一些重要差异。由于局部扩散,相邻种群动态之间会形成空间相关性,这种相关性会随着斑块间距离的增加而衰减。在平衡状态下,这种相关性的程度在不同的集合种群类型中有所不同,这取决于在定殖和灭绝动态中哪些过程占主导地位。这些动态过程之间的差异在被占据斑块“集群”的空间格局和分布中表现出来。此外,沿着栖息地可利用性的平滑梯度的集合种群动态在范围极限处的空间格局上显示出显著差异。我们还讨论了这些结果与疾病在集合种群中传播动态的相关性。