Kim Seung-Ki, Wang Kyu-Chang, Kim In-One, Lee Dong Soo, Cho Byung-Kyu
Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Laboratory for Fetal Medicine Research in Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6 Suppl 3):1456-64. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000333810.49283.39.
We compared the surgical results of simple encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) and EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis for the treatment of pediatric moyamoya disease.
Data for 159 children (up to 15 yr of age, 76 boys and 83 girls) who underwent indirect revascularization procedures for the treatment of moyamoya disease between 1987 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Group A patients underwent simple EDAS (n = 67). Group B patients underwent EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis (n = 92). The surgical results for each group were compared, in terms of clinical outcomes, neuroimaging changes, extent of revascularization evident on angiograms, and hemodynamic changes evident on single-photon emission computed tomographic scans. The average follow-up periods were 45 months for Group A and 22 months for Group B.
The overall clinical outcomes and neuroimaging changes tended to be better for Group B. In terms of single-photon emission computed tomographic changes of the whole brain after surgery, Group B patients exhibited more favorable outcomes than did Group A patients (62 versus 36%, P = 0.003). The surgical results for the anterior cerebral artery territory were significantly better for Group B than for Group A, with respect to outcomes of anterior cerebral artery symptoms (81 versus 40%, P = 0.015), revascularization on angiograms (79 versus 16%, P < 0.001), and hemodynamic changes on single-photon emission computed tomographic scans (70 versus 52%, P = 0.002). The incidences of postoperative infarctions were not significantly different between the two groups.
EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis is a more effective surgical modality for the treatment of pediatric moyamoya disease, compared with simple EDAS, because it covers both the middle cerebral artery and anterior cerebral artery territories of the brain.
我们比较了单纯脑-硬脑膜-动脉血管融合术(EDAS)和联合双额叶脑-帽状腱膜(骨膜)血管融合术的EDAS治疗小儿烟雾病的手术效果。
回顾性分析1987年至1998年间159例(年龄最大15岁,男76例,女83例)因烟雾病接受间接血管重建手术的儿童的数据。A组患者接受单纯EDAS手术(n = 67)。B组患者接受联合双额叶脑-帽状腱膜(骨膜)血管融合术的EDAS手术(n = 92)。比较两组的手术效果,包括临床结局、神经影像学变化、血管造影显示的血管重建程度以及单光子发射计算机断层扫描显示的血流动力学变化。A组平均随访时间为45个月,B组为22个月。
B组的总体临床结局和神经影像学变化往往更好。就术后全脑单光子发射计算机断层扫描变化而言,B组患者的结局比A组更有利(62%对36%,P = 0.003)。在大脑前动脉区域的手术效果方面,B组在大脑前动脉症状的结局(81%对40%,P = 0.015)、血管造影上的血管重建(79%对16%,P < 0.001)以及单光子发射计算机断层扫描上的血流动力学变化(70%对52%,P = 0.002)方面均显著优于A组。两组术后梗死发生率无显著差异。
与单纯EDAS相比,联合双额叶脑-帽状腱膜(骨膜)血管融合术的EDAS是治疗小儿烟雾病更有效的手术方式,因为它覆盖了大脑的大脑中动脉和大脑前动脉区域。